Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Mar;41(2):e13012.
doi: 10.1111/phpp.13012.

German Cohort Observational Study to Investigate the Short- and Long-Term Safety and Clinical Effectiveness of Afamelanotide 16 mg (SCENESSE) in Patients With Erythropoietic Protoporphyria (EPP)

Affiliations
Observational Study

German Cohort Observational Study to Investigate the Short- and Long-Term Safety and Clinical Effectiveness of Afamelanotide 16 mg (SCENESSE) in Patients With Erythropoietic Protoporphyria (EPP)

Bernhard Homey et al. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Afamelanotide 16 mg (SCENESSE) is the first approved treatment for erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP). EPP is a rare autosomal recessive inherited disorder of the haem biosynthesis pathway, where patients experience severe and debilitating acute phototoxicity. It affects at least one in 140,000 of the European population. A postauthorisation safety study (PASS) and a disease registry were imposed as conditions of the European marketing authorisation.

Objectives: Evaluate the short- and long-term safety and clinical effectiveness of afamelanotide 16 mg in EPP patients enrolled in the PASS in Germany.

Methods: The PASS (EUPAS13004) is an ongoing observational study collecting safety and effectiveness variables from treated and untreated EPP patients in the European EPP Disease Registry. Patients (n = 200, none untreated) received afamelanotide according to the summary of product characteristics. Treatment-emergent adverse events were collected as safety variables. Clinical effectiveness was assessed with the EPP-QoL tool and through treatment continuity.

Results: The short- and long-term safety and benefit-risk profile of afamelanotide under real-world conditions is consistent with the positive safety profile seen in clinical trials. EPP patients reported a significant increase in QoL compared with baseline values (p < 0.0001) and 91.0% of patients who started treatment continue being treated. The safety profile of afamelanotide in patients over 70 years of age is consistent with the overall patient population.

Conclusions: Afamelanotide treatment was highly effective and associated with a higher QoL in EPP patients. The study shows a positive safety profile of afamelanotide, with the treatment providing an ongoing clinical benefit.

Keywords: SCENESSE; afamelanotide; erythropoietic protoporphyria; photoprotection; porphyria; real‐world evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

B.H., K.S., C.M.S., D.B.‐G., K.W., L.K., U.S., P.S.‐R., J.W. and R.K.‐M. have received research support from CLINUVEL including reimbursement for data entry for the EMA directed disease registry. P.B. receives a salary from and owns stock in CLINUVEL. M.B. and G.W. receive a salary from CLINUVEL.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Frequency distribution of number of afamelanotide implants for patients by year.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Enrolment and patient status over time. Solid line represents cumulative number of patients enrolled; dotted line connotes number of patients continuing to receive treatment in Germany.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Mean EPP‐QoL total score for treated patients in Germany after treatment and matched baseline (at least one administration: Plain black bar, matched baseline: Striped bar). *Represents a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).

References

    1. Balwani M., Naik H., Anderson K. E., et al., “Clinical, Biochemical, and Genetic Characterization of North American Patients With Erythropoietic Protoporphyria and X‐Linked Protoporphyria,” JAMA Dermatology 153, no. 8 (2017): 789–796, 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.1557. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lecha M., Puy H., and Deybach J.‐C., “Erythropoietic Protoporphyria,” Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 4 (2009): 19, 10.1186/1750-1172-4-19. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wahlin S., Floderus Y., Stål P., and Harper P., “Erythropoietic Protoporphyria in Sweden: Demographic, Clinical, Biochemical and Genetic Characteristics,” Journal of Internal Medicine 269, no. 3 (2011): 278–288, 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02236.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Bataille S., Dutartre H., Puy H., et al., “Influence of Meteorological Data on Sun Tolerance in Patients With Erythropoietic Protoporphyria in France,” British Journal of Dermatology 175, no. 4 (2016): 768–775, 10.1111/bjd.14600. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gouya L., Puy H., Lamoril J., et al., “Inheritance in Erythropoietic Protoporphyria: A Common Wild‐Type Ferrochelatase Allelic Variant With Low Expression Accounts for Clinical Manifestation,” Blood 93, no. 6 (1999): 2105–2110. - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources