Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 27:7:1524972.
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1524972. eCollection 2025.

Relative Age Effects and contextual factors in male Spanish youth football: a 10-year cross sectional analysis of U12 to U16 players

Affiliations

Relative Age Effects and contextual factors in male Spanish youth football: a 10-year cross sectional analysis of U12 to U16 players

Iván Peña-González et al. Front Sports Act Living. .

Abstract

Introduction: The Relative Age Effects (RAEs) are complex, multifactorial phenomena influenced by individual (e.g., maturity status), task-related (e.g., field position or competitive level), and environmental (e.g., coaches' expectations) factors. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the relationship between RAEs and the maturity status, field position, competitive level and coaches' expectations within a sample of 1,120 young male Spanish football players [mean age: 13.72 ± 1.40 years; weight: 54.09 ± 11.85 kg; height: 162.11 ± 11.38 cm; years from peak height velocity (PHV): -0.22 ± 1.44], across tree age categories (U12, U14 and U16).

Methods: Data was collected over 10 years (2014-2024), considering the maturity status, estimated using the Mirwald et al. (2002) formula. Physical performance was assessed through tests for strength (1RM), power, speed (30-m sprint), agility (T-test), jumping (CMJ), and aerobic endurance (estimated VO2max). Players' field positions and coaches' efficacy expectations about their players were also collected.

Results: A Chi-square (χ²) analysis revealed a skewed distribution across birth quartiles within age categories (p < 0.05). Pearsons' correlation and linear regression analyses showed significant relationship between relative age and maturity status (r = 0.91; R² = 0.84). The RAEs were more pronounced at higher competitive levels, while the distribution bias in playing positions was comparable to the overall sample, with the exception of goalkeepers in the U12-14 categories. ANOVA results tend to a higher physical performance and coaches' efficacy expectations for players with higher RA in the U14 and U16 categories.

Conclusion: This study confirms the presence of strong RAEs over the past decade in youth football players from U12 to U16. Individual and environmental factors, such as advanced maturity status, the intensified selection processes at higher competitive levels, an increased physical performance and higher coaches' efficacy expectations, may contribute to RAEs in a complex and interdependent manner.

Keywords: maturation; physical performance; soccer; sports performance; team sports.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Player's distribution across birth quartiles for each age category and the overall sample. aSignificant difference with Q1; bSignificant difference with Q2; cSignificant difference with Q3. 25% expected distribution.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Linear regression analysis of chronological age (expressed in decimal age to reflect relative age) and maturity status by age category. r: Pearson's correlation coefficient; R2: Coefficient of determination.

References

    1. Cobley S, Baker J, Wattie N, Mckenna J. Annual age-grouping and athlete development. A metas-analytical review of relative age effects in sport. Sports Med. (2009) 39(39):235–56. 10.2165/00007256-200939030-00005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wattie N, Schorer J, Baker J. The relative age effect in sport: a developmental systems model. Sports Med. (2015) 45(1):83–94. 10.1007/s40279-014-0248-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dixon J, Horton S, Weir P, Dixon J, Horton S. Relative age effects: implications for leadership development. Int J Sport Soc. (2011) 2(2):1–16. 10.18848/2152-7857/CGP/v02i02/54068 - DOI
    1. Yagüe JM, de la Rubia A, Sánchez-Molina J, Maroto-Izquierdo S, Molinero O. The relative age effect in the 10 best leagues of male professional football of the union of European football associations (UEFA). J Sports Sci Med. (2018) 17(3):409–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gil SM, Gil J, Ruiz F, Irazusta A, Irazusta J. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of young soccer players according to their playing position: relevance for the selection process. J Strength Cond Res. (2007) 21(2):438. 10.1519/R-19995.1 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources