Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr;69(4):e70023.
doi: 10.1111/aas.70023.

INCEPT: The Intensive Care Platform Trial-Design and protocol

Affiliations

INCEPT: The Intensive Care Platform Trial-Design and protocol

Anders Granholm et al. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients receive many interventions, but few are supported by high-certainty evidence. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are essential for trustworthy comparisons of intervention effects, but conventional RCTs are costly, cumbersome, inflexible, and often turn out inconclusive. Adaptive platform trials may mitigate these issues and have higher probabilities of obtaining conclusive results faster and at lower costs per participant.

Methods: The Intensive Care Platform Trial (INCEPT) is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, randomised, embedded, multifactorial, international, adaptive platform trial including adults acutely admitted to ICUs. INCEPT will assess comparable groups of interventions (primarily commonly used interventions with clinical uncertainty and practice variation) nested in domains. Interventions may be either open-label or masked. New domains will continuously be added to the platform. INCEPT assesses multiple core outcomes selected following substantial stakeholder involvement: mortality, days alive without life support/out of hospital/free of delirium, health-related quality of life, cognitive function, and safety outcomes. Each domain will use one of these core outcomes as the primary outcome. INCEPT primarily uses Bayesian statistical methods with neutral, minimally informative or sceptical priors, adjustment for important prognostic baseline variables, and calculation of absolute and relative differences in the intention-to-treat populations. Domains and intervention arms may be stopped for superiority/inferiority, practical equivalence, or futility according to pre-specified adaptation rules evaluated using statistical simulation or at pre-specified maximum sample sizes. Domains may use response-adaptive randomisation, meaning that more participants will be allocated to interventions with higher probabilities of being superior.

Conclusions: INCEPT provides an efficient, pragmatic, and flexible platform for comparing the effects of many interventions used in adult ICU patients. The adaptive design enables the trial to use accumulating data to improve the treatment of future participants. INCEPT will provide high-certainty, conclusive evidence for many interventions, directly inform clinical practice, and thus improve patient-important outcomes.

Keywords: adaptive platform trial; intensive care; randomised clinical trial; trial protocol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Bodil Steen Rasmussen: unrestricted grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation for long‐term follow‐up in the Handling Oxygenation Targets in the Intensive Care Unit (HOT‐ICU) trial (ended June 2024). Tine Sylvest Meyhoff: coordinating investigator of the CLASSIC trial (NCT03668236) which was supported by a grant (NNF17OC0028608) from the Novo Nordisk Foundation and by the Sofus Friis' Foundation, Rigshospitalet's Research Council, and supported by the Danish Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. Hans‐Christian Thorsen‐Meyer: research grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF19OC0054863). Marie Oxenbøll Collet: the Novo Nordisk Foundation, Grant NNF21OC0072048 Postdoc fellowships in Nursing Research 2021. Ole Mathiesen: funding to research group from the Novo Nordisk Foundation and Sygeforsikringen ‘danmark’ for other projects. Mathias Maagaard: holds shares in Novo Nordisk. Peter Rossing: grants for investigator‐initiated studies to Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, from Novo Nordisk, Bayer, AstraZeneca, and Lexicon. Honoraria to Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen for steering group membership, consultancy, and education from AstraZeneca, Abbott, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Gilead, and Sanofi. No personal honoraria and no shares/patents. Asger Granfeldt: paid member of data safety monitoring board for Noorik Pharmaceuticals (ended November 2022), work for hire for NMD Pharma, and task force member of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) advanced life support task force. Theis Skovsgaard Itenov: the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital—Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital has a collaboration with Radiometer Medical Denmark on the testing and evaluation of equipment. The department receives reimbursements from the company. No individual receives any personal benefits or payments from the collaboration. Johanna Hästbacka: advisory board honorary fee from Paion (2022). Carmen Andrea Pfortmueller: no personal conflict of interests (personal financial interest). The department of Intensive Care at Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern reports grants from Orion Pharma, Abbott Nutrition International, B. Braun Medical AG, CSEM AG, Edwards Lifesciences Services GmbH, Kenta Biotech Ltd., Maquet Critical Care AB, Omnicare Clinical Research AG, Nestle, Pierre Fabre Pharma AG, Pfizer, Bard Medica S.A., Abbott AG, Anandic Medical Systems, Pan Gas AG Healthcare, Bracco, Hamilton Medical AG, Fresenius Kabi, Getinge Group Maquet AG, Dräger AG, Teleflex Medical GmbH, Glaxo Smith Kline, Merck Sharp and Dohme AG, Eli Lilly and Company, Baxter, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, CSL Behring, Novartis, Covidien, and Nycomed outside the submitted work. The money was paid into departmental funds; no personal financial gain applied. Davide Placido: holds stocks in Novo Nordisk. Theis Lange: served on data safety monitoring boards in studies run by Novo Nordisk and Leo Pharma. Anders Perner: research grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation. All other authors: no relevant conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Multiple domains in an adaptive platform trial, with the domains and interventions reflecting the tentative first domains and interventions on INCEPT. Each domain consists of comparable interventions (similar to what could be compared in a single stand‐alone trial), and all domains use the same overall platform trial infrastructure. All domains use the same overall platform eligibility criteria, and the overall eligible population thus consists of adult, acutely admitted ICU patients. Additional domain‐specific inclusion criteria further narrow down this population, for example, the albumin domain will be restricted to patients with shock, the thromboprophylaxis domain to patients with an indication for thromboprophylaxis with LMWH, and the glucose domain to patients with an insulin requirement for blood glucose management. Randomisation to the interventions in each domain is separate. Collection of data, including outcome data, is joint across domains. Based on adaptive (interim) analyses of outcome data, domains will adapt by changing the available interventions and domains and by adapting allocation probabilities, as described in the text and full core protocol available at the trial website. Domains will be stopped once there is sufficiently strong evidence for a conclusion according to pre‐defined criteria or at a pre‐specified maximum sample size. Additional details on all INCEPT domains will be specified in domain‐specific appendices to the core protocol. At the time of writing, the albumin domain has been approved, while the other domains illustrated are under preparation and have not yet been submitted for approval. CGM: continuous glucose monitoring; ICU: intensive care unit; INCEPT: the Intensive Care Platform Trial; LMWH: low‐molecular weight heparin.

References

    1. Dansk Intensiv Database . Årsrapport 2024. 2024. www.sundk.dk Accessed February 27, 2025.
    1. Laake JH, Dybwik K, Flaatten HK, et al. Impact of the post‐world war II generation on intensive care needs in Norway. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54:479‐484. doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02170.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fowler RA, Adhikari NKJ, Bhagwanjee S. Clinical review: critical care in the global context—disparities in burden of illness, access, and economics. Crit Care. 2008;12:225. doi:10.1186/cc6984 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adhikari NKJ, Fowler RA, Bhagwanjee S, Rubenfeld GD. Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults. The Lancet. 2010;376:1339‐1346. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60446-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang Z, Hong Y, Liu N. Scientific evidence underlying the recommendations of critical care clinical practice guidelines: a lack of high level evidence. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:1189‐1191. doi:10.1007/s00134-018-5142-8 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types