Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar-Apr;47(2):34-40.
doi: 10.1002/eahr.60001.

Building Ethical Foundations in Research: Adaptation of a Research Ethics Training Program for Adolescents

Angela K S Gummadi, Kirstin Griffin, Farah Contractor, Jessica Forrester, Irène P Mathieu

Building Ethical Foundations in Research: Adaptation of a Research Ethics Training Program for Adolescents

Angela K S Gummadi et al. Ethics Hum Res. 2025 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Although young people are increasingly being included in research that affects them, commonly used research ethics training programs are designed for highly educated adult learners. In this paper, we describe our process of adapting and implementing an adolescent-appropriate version of an existing Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) training module. Our research team adapted content from the CITI program's Researcher Basic Course-No Prisoners. Based on consultation with our youth researchers, this comprehensive training included audiovisual storytelling and information delivery, incorporation of relevant examples and connections to our research project, and interactive discussions. We successfully adapted a research ethics training for a nonacademic youth audience in partnership with them. Our adaptation was acceptable to participating youth researchers who reported greater understanding of ethical issues in social-behavioral research, increased understanding regarding the safeguarding of human subjects, and heightened confidence in their research abilities. Meaningful community and youth engagement in research necessitate the adaptation of training modules and materials that are accessible and appropriate for nonacademic audiences. We demonstrate the feasibility and success of one such adaptation for a youth participatory action research team involved in a study of adolescent mental health.

Keywords: human subjects research; nonacademic researchers; research ethics; research ethics training; youth participatory action research (YPAR).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ross, L. F., et al., “Human Subjects Protections in Community-Engaged Research: A Research Ethics Framework,” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 5, no. 1 (2010): 5–17; Luger, T. M., A. B. Hamilton, and G. True, “Measuring Community-Engaged Research Contexts, Processes, and Outcomes: A Mapping Review,” Milbank Quarterly 98, no. 2 (2020): 493-553.
    1. Wallerstein, N., “Engage for Equity: Advancing the Fields of Community-Based Participatory Research and Community-Engaged Research in Community Psychology and the Social Sciences,” American Journal of Community Psychology 67, no. 3-4 (2021): 251–55.
    1. Ozer, E. J., et al., “Toward Integration of Life Course Intervention and Youth Participatory Action Research,” Pediatrics 149, supp. 5 (2022): doi:10.1542/peds.2021-053509H.
    1. DeJonckheere, M., L. Vaughn, and D. Bruck, “Youth-Led Participatory Action Research: A Collaborative Methodology for Health, Education, and Social Change,” in Sage Research Methods Cases Part 2 (London: Sage Publications, 2016).
    1. Lindquist-Grantz, R., and M. Abraczinskas, “Using Youth Participatory Action Research as a Health Intervention in Community Settings,” Health Promotion Practice 21, no. 4 (2020): 573–81.