Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Apr 1;94(4):447-451.
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004324.

Use of Intraoperative Manual Drainage for the Detection of Lymphatic Ducts for Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Use of Intraoperative Manual Drainage for the Detection of Lymphatic Ducts for Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis

Hideki Tokumoto et al. Ann Plast Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) is a widely accepted conservative treatment for lymphedema. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) is a minimally invasive bypass surgery that improves lymphedema. However, identifying the lymphatic duct can be challenging during LVA. Transient dilation of the lymphatic ducts can be accomplished with intraoperative MLD, which can definitively identify and isolate the lymphatic ducts. This study describes the use of this intraoperative MLD procedure.

Methods: LVA procedures that used intraoperative MLD were compared with those that did not. The lymphatic diameter, LVA site, rate of cellulitis episodes, and indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography pattern characteristics between the 2 groups were compared. The surgeon performed MLD distal to the incision.

Results: The intraoperative MLD drainage (+) and drainage (-) groups consisted of 269 and 189 anastomoses, respectively. The median lymphatic duct diameter in the drainage (+) group was significantly larger (0.6 vs 0.5 mm; P < 0.001). The drainage (+) group had significantly higher linear pattern rates preoperatively (76.2% vs 37.6%; P < 0.001), lower extremity (68.4% vs 51.9%; P < 0.001), distal site (81.8% vs 63.5%; P < 0.001), and postoperative improvement by local ICG lymphography pattern (22.7% vs 14.3%; P = 0.03). The rate of cellulitis episodes was significantly lower in the drainage (+) group.

Conclusions: The successful detection rate of the lymphatic duct based on the intraoperative MLD was high on the distal side of the extremity and the lymphatic duct without sclerosis. This method was also effective for early-stage lymphedema.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared.

References

    1. Mortimer PS. The pathophysiology of lymphedema. Cancer . 1998;83:2798–2802.
    1. Sakorafas GH, Peros G, Cataliotti L, et al. Lymphedema following axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. Surg Oncol . 2006;15:153–165.
    1. Liu G, Hu J, Liu Y, et al. Factors influencing lower limb lymphedema after cervical cancer surgery: a case-control study. Lymphat Res Biol . 2023;21:169–178.
    1. Gelmon K. The taxoids: paclitaxel and docetaxel. Lancet . 1994;344:1267–1272.
    1. Lee MJ, Beith J, Ward L, et al. Lymphedema following taxane-based chemotherapy in women with early breast cancer. Lymphat Res Biol . 2014;12:282–288.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources