Application of bilateral tDCS over left and right M1 produces asymmetric training and retention effects when learning a rhythmic bimanual task
- PMID: 40085241
- PMCID: PMC11909090
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-025-07045-4
Application of bilateral tDCS over left and right M1 produces asymmetric training and retention effects when learning a rhythmic bimanual task
Abstract
Many motor skills require precise coordination between the arms to accomplish. The use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has helped to reveal hemispheric contributions to bimanual skills. In this study, three bilateral montages were used to explore hemispheric contributions to a rhythmic bimanual skill: anode left M1/cathode right M1 (LARC), anode right M1/cathode left M1 (RALC), and sham. Stimulation lasted 20-minutes during training. Retention was examined 6-hr after training. Participants (n = 46) learned a bimanual 90° relative-phase pattern with a half-cycle movement amplitude goal of 12 cm per arm at self-selected movement frequencies. Greater coordination variability in the 90° pattern emerged early under RALC compared to LARC, with no difference in performance accuracy. Larger movement amplitudes emerged in training with LARC compared to sham but not compared to RALC. tDCS montage had no impact on coordination variability and accuracy of the 90° pattern after the 6-hr delay. Montage was associated with a delayed movement amplitude effect emerging in retention, with larger amplitudes in LARC compared to RALC and sham. The asymmetries observed across training and retention emerged from of an interaction between tDCS and the left-hemisphere's role in the control of bimanual movements in right-handed individuals.
Keywords: Consolidation; Cortical excitability; Movement amplitude; Relative phase.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: All participants volunteered and signed a consent form before participating. The experimental procedures were developed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and approved by the TAMU human subject Interval Review Board. AI was not used to generate any part of the manuscript. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Figures




References
-
- Aramaki Y, Honda M, Okada T, Sadato N (2006) Neural correlates of the spontaneous phase transition during bimanual coordination. Cereb Cortex 16:1338–1348. 10.1093/cercor/bhj075 - PubMed
-
- Brashers-Krug T, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E (1996) Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 382:252–255. 10.1038/382252a0 - PubMed
-
- Buchanan JJ (2004) Learning a single limb multi-joint coordination pattern: the impact of a mechanical constraint on the coordination dynamics of learning and transfer. Exp Brain Res 156:39–54 - PubMed
-
- Buchanan JJ, Ryu YU (2005) The interaction of tactile information and movement amplitude in a multijoint bimanual circle-tracing task: phase transitions and loss of stability. Q J Exp Psychol 58A:769–787 - PubMed
-
- Buchanan JJ, Ryu YU (2006) One-to-one and polyrhythmic Temporal coordination in bimanual circle tracing. J Mot Behav 38:163–184 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources