Validation of the Iwate scoring system for the stratification of laparoscopic liver resections: An international multicenter study
- PMID: 40088501
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109597
Validation of the Iwate scoring system for the stratification of laparoscopic liver resections: An international multicenter study
Abstract
Introduction: The Iwate difficulty scoring system (DSS) is one of the most widely validated DSS for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). However, these studies only validated the 4 difficulty levels and did not validate the 12-point difficulty index of the system. To address current limitations in the studies validating the Iwate difficulty scoring system (DSS), we performed an international multicenter study to validate the Iwate DSS across both its four difficulty levels and 12-point difficulty index.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 22,252 patients undergoing LLR across 64 centers worldwide between 2005 and 2021 was performed. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed across the four difficulty levels and 12-point difficulty index of the Iwate DSS.
Results: A total of 14,759 patients met the inclusion criteria. The main indications for LLR were hepatocellular carcinoma/intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (52.8 %), and metastatic tumors liver (26.5 %). In terms of underlying liver pathology, 5127 patients (34.8 %) had liver cirrhosis, and 1214 patients (8.3 %) had portal hypertension. Intraoperative outcomes (operation time, blood loss, blood transfusion, use of Pringles maneuver and open conversion) and postoperative outcomes (length of stay, morbidity, major complications, and 90-day mortality) significantly increased with stepwise increases across the four difficulty levels (P < 0.001) and 12-point difficulty index (P < 0.001). These trends remained significant following adjustment for baseline characteristics (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: The Iwate DSS 12-point difficulty index and four difficulty levels correlated well with LLR difficulty as determined by key surrogate perioperative measures.
Keywords: Difficulty score; Iwate criteria; Laparoscopic liver resection; Perioperative outcomes; Validation.
Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest i) Dr Goh BK has received travel grants and honorarium from Johnson and Johnson, Olympus and Transmedic the local distributor for the Da Vinci Robot. ii) Dr Marino MV is a consultant for CAVA robotics LLC. iii) Johann Pratschke reports a research grant from Intuitive Surgical Deutschland GmbH and personal fees or non-fiNAcial support from Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, AFS Medical, Astellas, CHG Meridian, Chiesi, Falk Foundation, La Fource Group, Merck, Neovii, NOGGO, pharma-consult Peterson, and Promedicis. iv) Moritz Schmelzle reports personal fees or other support outside of the submitted work from Merck, Bayer, ERBE, Amgen, Johnson & Johnson, Takeda, Olympus, Medtronic, Intuitive. v) Asmund Fretland reports receiving speaker fees from Bayer. vi) Fernando Rotellar reports speaker fees and support outside the submitted work from Integra, Medtronic, Olympus, Corza, Sirtex and Johnson & Johnson. vii) Troisi RI reports speaker fees and support outside the submitted work from Integra, Stryker, Medtronic, Medistim, MSD.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
