Anatomical landmarks allow for accurate tibial component positioning in kinematically aligned mobile bearing medial unicompartimental knee arthroplasty
- PMID: 40089105
- DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104227
Anatomical landmarks allow for accurate tibial component positioning in kinematically aligned mobile bearing medial unicompartimental knee arthroplasty
Abstract
Background: The kinematic alignment (KA) technique for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) aims at preserving the native anatomy, laxity, and biomechanics of the medial compartment, ensuring optimal implants interaction throughout the knee's range of motion. The accuracy of the manual implantation of a medial KA UKA remains unexplored. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of tibial component implantation, using three intra-operative anatomical landmarks-the 'medial wall of the medial femoral condyle' (MWMC), a joint line-inserted 2.5 mm K-wire, and the 'deep MCL line' - with the hypothesis that their use would allow to accurately establish the orientation of the tibial cut in both the frontal and sagittal planes, as well as its thickness.
Patients and methods: Operative notes and pre/postoperative radiographs from a cohort of 90 consecutive KA mobile bearing medial UKAs (Oxford®) were retrospectively reviewed. Coronal and sagittal alignment accuracy were assessed by measuring the post-operative 'Tibial line to Femoral line Angle' (TFA) and 'Medial Sagittal Slope Difference' (MSSD), respectively. Based on these values, cases were divided into inliers (≤±3 °) and outliers (>±3 °). Polyethylene insert thickness, indicative of tibial cut accuracy, was extracted from operative notes.
Results: The mean TFA was -0.2 ° (SD 2.6; range -9 to 6.8), with 87.4% of inliers. The mean MSSD was -0.7 ° (SD 1.9; range -6.6 to 3.7), with 85.1% of inliers. The median insert thickness was 4 mm (range 3 to 6 mm), with 96.7% of cases within 4 ± 1 mm DISCUSSION: The use of straightforward anatomical landmarks - MWMC, K-wire, and deep MCL line - ensure accurate kinematic alignment of the tibial component of a medial UKA LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Keywords: Anatomical landmarks; Kinematic alignment, KA; Oxford; Tibial slope; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, UKA.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have not conflict of interest. Outside the current study, CR declares being a consultant for Medacta.
Similar articles
-
Kinematic alignment technique for medial OXFORD UKA: An in-silico study.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Feb;105(1):63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Dec 27. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 30595413
-
Do varus or valgus outliers have higher forces in the medial or lateral compartments than those which are in-range after a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? limb and joint line alignment after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty.Bone Joint J. 2017 Oct;99-B(10):1319-1328. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B10.BJJ-2017-0066.R1. Bone Joint J. 2017. PMID: 28963153
-
Rotational alignment errors can occur in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty if anatomical landmarks are misused: A preoperative CT scan analysis.Knee. 2020 Jan;27(1):242-248. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Dec 24. Knee. 2020. PMID: 31875837
-
Kinematic alignment of medial UKA is safe: a systematic review.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Mar;30(3):1082-1094. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06462-6. Epub 2021 Mar 20. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022. PMID: 33743031
-
[Research progress on finite element analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in medial knee compartmental osteoarthritis].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jun 15;35(6):781-785. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202101028. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021. PMID: 34142508 Free PMC article. Review. Chinese.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials