Assessment of the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the revised impact of miscarriage scale (RIMS): a validity and reliability study
- PMID: 40089718
- PMCID: PMC11909861
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-025-07422-5
Assessment of the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the revised impact of miscarriage scale (RIMS): a validity and reliability study
Abstract
Background: Miscarriage is a traumatic life event that involves over forty thousand Italian women every year. Women affected by this loss can have long-term psychological consequences. For this reason, it is paramount to identify women at risk of developing such complications to ensure they receive proper support. The aim of this study is to perform a translation into Italian and a validation of the Revised Impact of Miscarriage Scale (RIMS), which is a valuable support for healthcare professionals to assess women after a miscarriage.
Methods: Double-translation technique was performed. A sample of 543 women completed the survey for the validation process which included RIMS, the Perinatal Grief Scale (PGS) and NSESSS. These last two instruments are usually used to assess the impact of perinatal loss on women's life.
Results: The Italian version of RIMS (RIMS-IT) has good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha value 0,89). Factor analysis was conducted to confirm the construct validity and three factors were extracted. They reflected the factorial analysis of the original version. Scores of RIMS, PGS, and NSESSS were strongly correlated.
Conclusions: RIMS-IT can be a valuable support for clinicians and researchers to identify women at risk of developing psychiatric symptoms and to analyse factors involved in the onset of these complications.
Keywords: Bereavement; Midwives; Miscarriage; Screening.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was undertaken in accordance with ethical standards from The Code of Ethics of the World American Association (Declaration of Helsinki, 1964) and its later amendments. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Milano Bicocca Ethics Committee prior to commencing the study (Approval number: 0021150/22, approval data: 10/03/2022). Every participant provided at the start of the survey his consent after reading the participant information and meeting the eligibility criteria. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Geen-top Guideline n°17 - The investigation and treatment of couples with recurrent first-trimester and second-trimester miscarriage. In: Green-top Guidelines. 2011. https://www.rcog.org.uk/media/3cbgonl0/gtg_17.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2022.
-
- Quenby S, Gallos ID, Dhillon-Smith RK, et al. Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss. Lancet. 2021;397:1658–67. - PubMed
-
- D.P.R. 25 novembre 1976 n° 1026. Italy, 1976.
-
- ISTAT. I.Stat - Aborti spontanei - dimissioni rispetto al luogo di residenza della donna. 2020. http://dati.istat.it/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=DCIS_ABORTISPONTR#. Accessed 15 Sep 2022.