Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2025 Apr;82(2):128-142.
doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.70003. Epub 2025 Mar 16.

The Australasian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Consensus statements on refeeding syndrome

Affiliations
Practice Guideline

The Australasian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Consensus statements on refeeding syndrome

Kylie Matthews-Rensch et al. Nutr Diet. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Aims: This consensus statement document describes the recommendations of the Australasian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition regarding the identification and management of refeeding syndrome and refeeding syndrome risk.

Methods: An expert working group completed a review of the literature to develop recommendations for the consensus statements. Review of the drafted consensus statements was undertaken by highly experienced clinicians.

Results: The identification and management of refeeding syndrome requires a multidisciplinary approach. Actual refeeding syndrome is rare; however, all patients should be assessed for the risk of its development. Refeeding syndrome should only be diagnosed if the patient has had adequate nutrition intake (≥50% of estimated requirements), with electrolyte imbalances and clinical symptoms emerging after its commencement. Thiamin and multivitamin supplementation and regular electrolyte monitoring should be provided to all patients at risk of developing refeeding syndrome. There is no evidence that patients at risk of developing refeeding syndrome should be started at an initial lower enteral feeding rate than already recommended for checking tolerance to enteral feeds. Goal nutrition rates should be reached within 24-72 h for all routes of nutrition. Low electrolyte levels should be replaced as per local guidelines, with consideration given to the route of replacement.

Conclusion: These consensus statements are expected to provide guidance at a national level to improve the identification and management of refeeding syndrome and refeeding syndrome risk.

Keywords: AuSPEN; electrolyte imbalance; hypophosphataemia; inpatients; malnutrition; nutrition support; refeeding syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. da Silva JS, Seres DS, Sabino K, et al. ASPEN consensus recommendations for refeeding syndrome. Nutr Clin Pract. 2020;35(2):178‐195. - PubMed
    1. Matthews‐Rensch K, Capra S, Palmer M. Systematic review of energy initiation rates and refeeding syndrome outcomes. Nutr Clin Prac. 2021;36(1):153‐168. - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence . Nutrition Support in Adults; National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2006.
    1. Ambrose T, De Silva A, Naghibi M, et al. Refeeding risks in patients requiring intravenous nutrition support: results of a two‐centre, prospective, double‐blind, randomised controlled trial. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021;41:143‐152. - PubMed
    1. de Vargas CK, de Magalhães Francesconi CF. An unexpectedly high incidence of refeeding syndrome in patients with total parenteral nutrition in a reference university hospital. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(6):3702‐3707. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources