Perceived determinants of the use of coercion in inpatient child and adolescent psychiatry: a qualitative interview study with staff
- PMID: 40091017
- PMCID: PMC11912791
- DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-06690-x
Perceived determinants of the use of coercion in inpatient child and adolescent psychiatry: a qualitative interview study with staff
Abstract
Background: Understanding factors influencing the use of coercive practices in clinical psychiatry is necessary to develop strategies to reduce their use. However, there is little evidence regarding staff perceptions of such factors, particularly in inpatient child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP).
Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with nurses, senior consultants and heads of units in inpatient CAP in Sweden 2021 (N = 9). The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Data on informal coercion were analysed separately using a deductive approach based on previously proposed hierarchies for informal coercion.
Results: We identified one overarching theme of factors reported to influence the use of coercive practices: "Trust and distrust in coercive and non-coercive approaches", in turn encompassing the two subthemes "Ward culture" and "Available resources and strain". Our findings suggest a risk of a negative spiral of coercion emerging when there is low professional trust in non-coercive approaches and high trust in coercive methods. Informal coercion was used frequently and observed to occur in two distinct processes: one concerning continuous coercive escalation, and the other involving sustained efforts at the same coercion level.
Conclusions: Trusting the efficacy of non-coercive approaches in inpatient CAP care appears critical for their success; a finding that may inform strategies to reduce coercion and address frequent use with individual patients.
Keywords: Child and adolescent mental health; Coercion; Coercive measures; Informal coercion; Inpatient care; Psychiatry; Staff; Treatment pressures.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: We submitted a consultative ethics application to the Swedish Ethical Review Authority, which determined that the study did not require an ethical permit since no personal records were collected or handled (dnr: 2020–06898). All participants provided verbal and written informed consent before the start of the interviews. All procedures adhered to the relevant guidelines and regulations, such as the Declaration of Helsinki. Clinical trial number: not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Belayneh Z, Chavulak J, Lee DCA, Petrakis M, Haines TP. Prevalence and variability of restrictive care practice use (physical restraint, seclusion and chemical restraint) in adult mental health inpatient settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2024;33(4):1256–81. - PubMed
-
- Moell A, Smitmanis Lyle M, Rozental A, Långström N. Rates and risk factors of coercive measure use in inpatient child and adolescent mental health services: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2024;11(10):839–52. - PubMed
-
- Nunno MA, McCabe LA, Izzo CV, Smith EG, Sellers DE, Holden MJ. A 26-Year study of restraint fatalities among children and adolescents in the United States: A failure of organizational structures and processes. Child Youth Care Forum. 2022;51(3):661–80.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
