Withdrawal of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure and Improved Ejection Fraction
- PMID: 40091747
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072855
Withdrawal of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure and Improved Ejection Fraction
Abstract
Background: Limited evidence exists on the prognostic role of continuing medical therapy in patients with heart failure (HF) and an ejection fraction (EF) that has improved over time. This study assessed rates of, patient profiles, and associations with morbidity/mortality of renin-angiotensin inhibitors (RASi), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi), beta-blockers (BBL), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) withdrawal in patients with HF with improved EF.
Methods: Patients with a first recorded EF <40% and a later EF ≥40% from the Swedish HF registry between June 11, 2000, and December 31, 2023, were included in this retrospective observational study. Withdrawal was defined as a patient on treatment at the first (reduced) but not at the second (improved) registration. The association between withdrawal and time to first cardiovascular mortality/hospitalization for HF with censoring at 1 year was assessed by Cox regression model using overlap weighting.
Results: Of 8728 patients with HF with improved EF (median age, 70 years [25th to 75th percentile, 61-78], 2611 [29.9%] women), 96%, 94%, and 46% received RASi/ARNi, BBL, and MRA, respectively, when EF was <40%. The withdrawal rates at the time of the improved EF registration were 4.4% for RASi/ARNi, 3.3% for BBL, and 17.2% for MRA. Predictors of withdrawal included lower use of other HF medications, higher EF at the later EF registration, and a longer time between the 2 EF assessments. After weighting, withdrawal was independently associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular mortality/hospitalization for HF by 38% for RASi/ARNi and 36% for MRA, but not for BBL. Withdrawal of BBL was associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome in the subgroup of patients with an improved EF of 40% to 49% versus ≥50% (P-interaction 0.03).
Conclusions: In patients with HF with improved EF, HF therapy withdrawal was rare. Withdrawing RASi/ARNi and MRA was associated with higher mortality/morbidity at 1 year. No association was found for BBL withdrawal, albeit with a significant heterogeneity for EF at improvement, suggesting better outcomes with continuing BBL only until EF improves up to 50%. These results are hypothesis-generating and highlight the need for randomized controlled trials testing BBL withdrawal in patients with HF with improved EF.
Keywords: beta-blockers; heart failure; mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; registries; renin-angiotensin system; withholding treatment.
Conflict of interest statement
C.B. reports a clinical training grant from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology and a training grant for research in foreign institutions from the Italian Society of Cardiology. F.L. reports speaker fees from AstraZeneca. U.D. reports research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Vifor, Boston Scientific, and Roche Diagnostics and honoraria/consultancies from Amgen, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. M.P. reports speaker fees from Menarini, Servier, AstraZeneca, and Boehringer Ingelheim and support for attending meetings from NovoNordisk, and is vice president of the European Society of Cardiology. A.P.M. reports fees for participating in study committees outside the present work from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Novartis. and Sanofi. L.H.L. reports grants, consulting, and honoraria from Abbott, Alleviant, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biopeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Edwards, FineHeart, MedScape/WebMD, Merck/MSD, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, OrionPharma, Pharmacosmos, Radcliffe Cardiology, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Translational Medicines Academy, and Vifor, and stock ownership in AnaCardio. G.S. reports grants from Vifor Pharma, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, AstraZeneca, Pharmacosmos, Merck, Bayer, Cytokinetics, and Servier; consulting fees from TEVA, AstraZeneca, Medical Education Global Solutions, Atheneum, Genesis, CSL Vifor, Servier, and Translational Medicine Academy Foundation; speaker fees from Novartis, Roche, Cytokinetics, Hikma, Medtronic, Pharmacosmos, AstraZeneca, Menarini, Vifor Pharma, INTAS, and GETZ; support for attending meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim and Servier; and fees for participating on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board outside the present work from AstraZeneca, Edwards LifeScience, Uppsala Clinical Research Center, CSL Vifor, Servier, Abbott, and Cytokinetics. The other authors report no conflicts.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous