Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 15;10(3):101718.
doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101718. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Association of Histologic Subtype With Radiation Response and Survival Outcomes in Synovial Sarcoma

Affiliations

Association of Histologic Subtype With Radiation Response and Survival Outcomes in Synovial Sarcoma

Jennifer K Matsui et al. Adv Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a rare, aggressive soft tissue malignancy that is divided into biphasic and monophasic histologic subtypes. In addition to surgical resection, radiation therapy (RT) improves local control in patients at higher risk of recurrence. This study aimed to investigate the impact of histologic subtype on radiation response and survival outcomes in patients treated with RT as part of definitive management.

Methods and materials: We retrospectively identified patients with SS treated with RT and surgical resection from 1997 to 2020 at Stanford Medical Center. We assessed the association between histologic subtypes (biphasic vs monophasic) and response to preoperative RT based on imaging and pathology. Volumetric response was calculated using the pre-RT and post-RT/preoperative postcontrast T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging images. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted using Cox regression models. Variables for univariable and multivariable analyses included age, histologic subtypes, tumor location, tumor size, margin status, chemotherapy, and performance status.

Results: In our study, 50 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 34.8 years at diagnosis, and 36% (n = 18) received concurrent chemotherapy. Biphasic (n = 18, 36%) and monophasic (n = 32, 64%) tumors exhibited significant differences in negative margin status (94% vs 66%, P = .036). Of the 22 patients who underwent preoperative RT, 15 patients had pre-RT and post-RT imaging to assess volumetric changes. Biphasic tumors demonstrated less necrosis at the time of surgical resection but a significantly greater volumetric decrease with preoperative RT (42% vs 5%, P = .004). PFS and OS were superior in biphasic tumors (P = .003 and P = .009, respectively). Multivariable analyses identified histologic subtypes (monophasic vs biphasic) as a significant factor impacting PFS (HR, 5.65; 95% CI, 1.78-17.91; P = .003).

Conclusions: Biphasic tumors exhibit an improved volumetric response to preoperative RT and improved outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of considering histology when tailoring treatment for patients with SS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Everett J. Moding has served as a paid consultant for Guidepoint and GLG. The other authors declare that they have no financial interests/personal relationships, which may be considered as potential competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Response to preoperative radiation therapy (RT) by histologic subtype. Box and whisker plots of (A) volumetric decrease measured by imaging and (B) percent necrosis at the time of surgical resection in biphasic and monophasic synovial sarcomas treated with preoperative RT. Boxes show the interquartile range and whiskers extend to the maximum and minimum values. (C) Correlation of percent necrosis and volumetric decrease in synovial sarcomas treated with preoperative RT. Line of best fit and 95% CI are displayed on the graph.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Tumor response after preoperative radiation therapy (RT). Representative monophasic tumor before RT (A) and after RT (B). Representative biphasic tumor before RT in the axial (C) and sagittal (E) views and after RT in the axial (D) and sagittal (F) views.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Progression-free survival stratified by histologic subtypes.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overall survival stratified by histologic subtypes.

References

    1. Aytekin MN, Öztürk R, Amer K, Yapar A. Epidemiology, incidence, and survival of synovial sarcoma subtypes: SEER database analysis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2020;28 - PubMed
    1. Lewis JJ, Antonescu CR, Leung DH, et al. Synovial sarcoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in 112 patients with primary localized tumors of the extremity. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2087–2094. - PubMed
    1. Rajwanshi A, Srinivas R, Upasana G. Malignant small round cell tumors. J Cytol. 2009;26:1–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ladanyi M, Antonescu CR, Leung DH, et al. Impact of SYT-SSX fusion type on the clinical behavior of synovial sarcoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study of 243 patients. Cancer Res. 2002;62:135–140. - PubMed
    1. Clark J, Rocques PJ, Crew AJ, et al. Identification of novel genes, SYT and SSX, involved in the t(X;18)(p11.2;q11.2) translocation found in human synovial sarcoma. Nat Genet. 1994;7:502–508. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources