Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb 1;17(2):e219-e228.
doi: 10.4317/jced.62449. eCollection 2025 Feb.

E-cigarette: a safe tool or a risk factor for oral cancer? A systematic review

Affiliations
Review

E-cigarette: a safe tool or a risk factor for oral cancer? A systematic review

Gaspare Palaia et al. J Clin Exp Dent. .

Abstract

Background: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are considered relatively safe, thus tobacco and nicotine delivery products have become popular in the last few years. However, the safety of long-term use of these products on oral health is still questionable. E-cigarettes may have potential risks to oral health that can be demonstrated as cellular damage, genetic instability, and mucosal lesions. This review aims to observe the role of e-cigarettes as a risk factor for oral cancer development.

Material and methods: This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines to provide reliable data on the role of electronic cigarettes as a risk factor for oral cancer development. The research was performed on Pubmed and Scopus by three reviewers from the Oral Pathology Department (Sapienza University of Rome) in May 2024. The search terms included: "e-cigarette", "oral cancer", and "risk factor" where 32 articles from PubMed and 75 from Scopus were collected. A total of 12 studies met the eligibility criteria: 6 clinical studies and 6 in vitro. All the included studies were subjected to quality assessment and data extraction processes. The risk of bias assessment of in vitro studies revealed low or unknown risk. None of the studies had any industrial sponsoring and almost all the papers (90%) had the same methods, 64% measured the cell vitality. The qualitative analysis was done for all the included clinical studies using the RoB assessment tool (MINORS). The range of the total RoB score in the comparative studies was between 12 and 23.

Results: The clinical studies involved a total of 413 participants were also included. Most studies did not specify the age and gender of participants and patients were divided into three main groups based on specific criteria: non-smokers, smokers, and e-cigarette users. These studies highlighted cases of mucosal lesions and genetic instability associated with e-cigarette use.

Conclusions: However, the limited long-term data and conflicting results emphasize the need for a larger number of studies, such as randomized controlled trials and cohort studies, to acquire more data about the safety and risks associated with e-cigarettes. Key words:E-cigarettes, squamous cell carcinoma, oral oncology, smoking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram shows the study selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias assessment scores in the in vitro studies (n=6).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Quality and risk of bias assessment scores of clinical studies (n=6) using the MINORS tool.

References

    1. Marques P, Piqueras L, Sanz MJ. An updated overview of e cigarette impact on human health", Marques et al. Respir Res. 2021;22(1):151. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guo J, Hecht SS. DNA damage in human oral cells induced by use of e-cigarettes. Drug Test Anal. 2023;15(10):1189–1197. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sancilio S, Gallorini M, Cataldi A, di Giacomo V. Cytotoxicity and apoptosis induction by e-cigarette fluids in human gingival fibroblasts. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(3):477–83. - PubMed
    1. Farsalinos KE, Romagna G, Tsiapras D, Kyrzopoulos S, Voudris V. Characteristics, perceived side effects and benefits of electronic cigarette use: a worldwide survey of more than 19,000 consumers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(4):4356–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Selya AS, Dierker L, Rose JS, Hedeker D, Mermelstein RJ. The Role of Nicotine Dependence in E-Cigarettes' Potential for Smoking Reduction. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018;20(10):1272–1277. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources