Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb 28:16:1472655.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1472655. eCollection 2025.

Verbal consent in biomedical research: moving toward a future standard practice?

Affiliations
Review

Verbal consent in biomedical research: moving toward a future standard practice?

Alycia Noë et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

Properly obtaining informed consent is a core obligation for research conducted using human subjects. The traditional informed consent process involves written forms and obtaining signatures. This process remains the standard, but in various research settings, such as COVID-19 and rare disease research, verbal consent has increasingly become the norm. Although verbal consent is used in these settings, its use is still a subject of debate. This article reviews in what medical settings verbal consent is commonly seen today, various advantages and disadvantages of verbal consent, and its legislative and policy ecosystem. In doing so, this review article asserts that it is time for the debate over verbal consent to come to an end and for legislator and policymakers to acknowledge its use and to formalize the process. This will allow verbal consent to be regulated in a similar manner to written consent and will give clinician-researchers guidance on how to better implement verbal consent in their studies to addressing ongoing concerns with the consenting process as a whole.

Keywords: COVID-19; biomedical research; consent; rare disease; verbal consent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Abrams J. A., Tabaac A., Jung S., Else-Quest N. M. (2020). Considerations for employing intersectionality in qualitative health research. Soc. Sci. and Med. 258 (113138), 113138–113210. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113138 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albers G. (2017). Treaties with indigenous peoples in Canada. Available at: https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/treaties-with-indigeno... (Accessed July 9, 2024).
    1. Alberta Health Services (2010). Consent to treatment/procedures. Available at: https://extranet.ahsnet.ca/teams/policydocuments/1/clp-consent-to-treatm... (Accessed July 10, 2024).
    1. Allocca C. M., Bledsoe M. J., Albert M., Anisimov S. V., Bravo E., Castelhano M. G., et al. (2020). Biobanking in the COVID-19 era and beyond: Part 1. How early experiences can translate into actionable wisdom. Biopreservation Biobanking 18 (6), 533–546. 10.1089/bio.2020.0082 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baer A. R., Devine S., Beardmore C. D., Catalano R. (2011). Clinical investigator responsibilities. J. Oncol. Pract. 7 (2), 124–128. 10.1200/JOP.2010.000216 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources