This is a preprint.
Overlap of high-risk individuals across family history, genetic & non-genetic breast cancer risk models: Analysis of 180,398 women from European & Asian ancestries
- PMID: 40093266
- PMCID: PMC11908272
- DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.27.25323002
Overlap of high-risk individuals across family history, genetic & non-genetic breast cancer risk models: Analysis of 180,398 women from European & Asian ancestries
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is multifactorial. Focusing on limited risk factors may miss high-risk individuals.
Methods: We assessed the performance and overlap of various risk factors in identifying high-risk individuals for invasive breast cancer (BrCa) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 161,849 European-ancestry and 18,549 Asian-ancestry women. Discriminatory ability was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). High-risk criteria included: 5-year absolute risk ≥1·66% by the Gail model [GAILbinary]; first-degree family history of breast cancer [FHbinary]; 5-year absolute risk ≥1·66% by a 313-variants polygenic risk score [PRSbinary]; and carriers of pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes [PTVbinary].
Findings: The 5-year absolute risk by PRS outperformed the Gail model in predicting BrCa (Europeansvs controls: AUCPRS=0·635 [0·632-0·638] vs AUCGail=0·492 [0·489-0·495]; Asiansvs controls: AUCPRS=0·564 [0·556-0·573] vs AUCGail=0·506 [0·497-0·514]). PRSbinary and GAILbinary identified more high-risk European than Asia individuals. High-risk proportions were higher among BrCa (16-26%) and DCIS (20-33%) compared to controls (9-15%) among young Europeans and all Asians. Fewer than 7% of BrCa, 10% of DCIS, and 3% of controls were classified as high-risk by multiple risk classifiers. Overlap between PRSbinary and PTVbinary was minimal (<0·65% Europeans, <0·15% Asians) compared to the proportion at high risk using PTVbinary alone (Europeans: 4·6%, Asians: 4·4%) and PRSbinary alone (Europeans: 13·9%, Asians: 8·5%). PRSbinary and FHbinary uniquely identified 5-6% and 9-11% of young BrCa, respectively.
Interpretation: The incomplete overlap between high-risk individuals identified by PRSbinary, GAILbinary, FHbinary, and PTVbinary highlights the need for a comprehensive approach to breast cancer risk prediction.
Keywords: BRCA1; BRCA2; Breast cancer; Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS); Gail model; Polygenic risk score (PRS); Risk stratification; risk-based screening.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Sedeta E. T., Jobre B. & Avezbakiyev B. Breast cancer: Global patterns of incidence, mortality, and trends. Journal of Clinical Oncology 41, 10528–10528, doi:10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.10528 (2023). - DOI
-
- Lim Z. L., Ho P. J., Khng A. J., Yeoh Y. S., Ong A. T. W., Tan B. K. T. et al. Mammography screening is associated with more favorable breast cancer tumor characteristics and better overall survival: case-only analysis of 3739 Asian breast cancer patients. BMC Med 20, 239, doi:10.1186/s12916-022-02440-y (2022). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous