Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 13:17449871241307139.
doi: 10.1177/17449871241307139. Online ahead of print.

Articulating your research focus via a capability statement: professional development for early career researchers

Affiliations

Articulating your research focus via a capability statement: professional development for early career researchers

Amy-Louise Byrne et al. J Res Nurs. .

Abstract

Background: A programme of research (PoR) is a cohesive and succinct expression of a researcher's area of interest, capturing their passions and commitments, as well as their capabilities. A PoR takes the form of a series of related research projects with a specific focus on a knowledge gap, related to the researcher's discipline. One way in which a PoR can be supported is through the articulation of a clear research aim and capability statement.

Aims: This paper aims to provide early career researchers (ECRs) with a process to develop their own capability statements, providing examples from a professional development activity undertaken by the authors.

Results: This paper provides a five-step process for researchers to develop their own capability statement and gives examples and prompts to support this.

Conclusion and contribution to nursing: Reflections on the value of this process are provided, demonstrating a gap in current ECR processes in articulating their own capabilities.

Keywords: academic; early career researchers; professional development; research; research capability statement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Bothello J, Roulet TJ. (2019) The imposter syndrome, or the mis-representation of self in academic life. Journal of Management Studies 56: 854–861. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12344. - DOI
    1. Castelló M, McAlpine L, Sala-Bubaré A, et al. (2021) What perspectives underlie ‘researcher identity’? A review of two decades of empirical studies. Higher Education 81: 567–590. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-020-00557-8. - DOI
    1. Chiu AS, Pei KY, Jean RA. (2019) Mentoring sideways – A model of resident-to-resident research mentorship. Journal of Surgical Education 76: 1–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.05.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eslen-Ziya H, Yildirim TM. (2022) Perceptions of gendered-challenges in academia: How women academics see gender hierarchies as barriers to achievement. Gender, Work, and Organization 29: 301–308. DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12744. - DOI
    1. Fitch IM. (1996) Creating a research agenda with relevance to cancer nursing practice. Cancer Nursing 19: 335–342. DOI: 10.1097/00002820-199610000-00001. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources