Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar 13:17585732251320070.
doi: 10.1177/17585732251320070. Online ahead of print.

Assessment and diagnosis of non-traumatic shoulder instability: A scoping review

Antoine Tisserand  1 , Anju Jaggi  2 , Philippe-Antoine David  3 , Thomas Lathiere  1   4   5
Affiliations
Review

Assessment and diagnosis of non-traumatic shoulder instability: A scoping review

Antoine Tisserand et al. Shoulder Elbow. .

Abstract

Background: Given its complexity, there is no consensus regarding the assessment of non-traumatic shoulder instability (NTSI) to this day. We, therefore, conducted a scoping review to map the existing white and grey literature regarding diagnostic and assessment tools for the NTSI population.

Method: We followed the Arksey and O'Malley five-stage guideline for the conduct of scoping reviews and searched through 12 electronic databases for English-language articles and reviews from 2000 to 2024 related to NTSI's diagnosis and assessment tools.

Results: Among the 3426 identified studies, 58 were included (describing 59 different interventions). Case-control studies (43.1%, 25/58) and narrative reviews (34.5%, 20/58) were the most prevalent. Diagnostic imaging was the most studied intervention (35.6%, 21/59). Twenty-seven studies specified a direction of instability, of which 59% (16/27) were multidirectional instability. Non-traumatic shoulder instability often affects young individuals, with complex symptoms, including neuromotor deficits, muscular imbalances and kinematic alterations, involving psycho-behavioural and somatosensory components.

Discussion: Non-traumatic shoulder instability's aetiologies and clinical manifestations are multifactorial. The prevalence and incidence of this dysfunction are probably underestimated. Clinical history is crucial to retrace a complex and chronic dysfunction. The use of orthopaedic shoulder tests and the routine use of imaging currently appear to have limited relevance as a first-line approach.

Keywords: assessment; diagnosis; instability; non-traumatic; scoping review; shoulder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) flow diagram.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Orthopaedic shoulder test (OST).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Noorani A, Goldring M, Jaggi A, et al. BESS/BOA patient care pathways: atraumatic shoulder instability. Shoulder Elbow 2019; 11: 60–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuhn JE. A new classification system for shoulder instability. Br J Sports Med 2010; 44: 341–346. - PubMed
    1. Kuhn JE, Helmer TT, Dunn WR, et al. Development and reliability testing of the frequency, etiology, direction, and severity (FEDS) system for classifying glenohumeral instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20: 548–556. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rockwood C. Subluxation of the shoulder: the classification, diagnosis and treatment. Orthop Trans 1979; 4: 306.
    1. Thomas SC, Matsen FA. An approach to the repair of avulsion of the glenohumeral ligaments in the management of traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71: 506–513. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources