Angular stable intramedullary nail versus locking plate fixation of osteoporotic surgical neck proximal humerus fractures: A biomechanical comparison
- PMID: 40093998
- PMCID: PMC11907631
- DOI: 10.1177/17585732251324497
Angular stable intramedullary nail versus locking plate fixation of osteoporotic surgical neck proximal humerus fractures: A biomechanical comparison
Abstract
Background: Our study's purpose was to compare biomechanical performances of a proximal humerus locking plate (PHLP) with an antegrade intramedullary nail (IMN) in an osteoporotic two-part surgical neck proximal humerus fracture model.
Methods: Simulated fractures were made through the surgical neck of synthetic osteoporotic humeri. One group had identical transverse fractures instrumented with a PHLP with seven screws (PHLP-7; n = 4), a PHLP with nine screws (PHLP-9; n = 2), or an IMN (n = 4). Each underwent pre-fatigue testing, an identical fatigue protocol, and post-fatigue testing. A second high oblique fracture line was tested identically with PHLP-9 (n = 4) and IMN (n = 4) constructs.
Results: Statistical analyses of transverse specimen pre-fatigue stiffness revealed that the PHLP-7 and PHLP-9 were stiffer in anteroposterior bending and torsion compared to the IMN. There was no difference between the three constructs in varus-valgus bending or compression. Post-fatigue stiffness comparisons revealed no difference between the three constructs. For the oblique fracture, pre-fatigue differences were found with the IMN stiffer in varus-valgus bending and the PHLP-9 stiffer in torsion.
Discussion: The biomechanical performance of an angular-stable proximal humeral nail design was comparable, especially following fatigue, to locked plate/screw constructs in a synthetic osteoporotic two-part surgical neck proximal humerus fracture model.
Keywords: biomechanics; intramedullary nail; locked; osteoporosis; proximal humerus fracture; proximal humerus locking plate.
© The Author(s) 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Egol KA, Ong CC, Walsh M, et al. Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA Types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma 2008; 22: 159–164. - PubMed
-
- Südkamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 1320–1328. - PubMed
-
- Hessmann MH, Hansen WSM, Krummenauer F, et al. Locked plate fixation and intramedullary nailing for proximal humerus fractures: a biomechanical evaluation. J Trauma 2005; 58: 1194–1201. - PubMed
-
- Owsley KC, Gorczyca JT. Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures [corrected]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 233–240. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources