Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 13:17585732251324497.
doi: 10.1177/17585732251324497. Online ahead of print.

Angular stable intramedullary nail versus locking plate fixation of osteoporotic surgical neck proximal humerus fractures: A biomechanical comparison

Affiliations

Angular stable intramedullary nail versus locking plate fixation of osteoporotic surgical neck proximal humerus fractures: A biomechanical comparison

Eric Samuelson et al. Shoulder Elbow. .

Abstract

Background: Our study's purpose was to compare biomechanical performances of a proximal humerus locking plate (PHLP) with an antegrade intramedullary nail (IMN) in an osteoporotic two-part surgical neck proximal humerus fracture model.

Methods: Simulated fractures were made through the surgical neck of synthetic osteoporotic humeri. One group had identical transverse fractures instrumented with a PHLP with seven screws (PHLP-7; n = 4), a PHLP with nine screws (PHLP-9; n = 2), or an IMN (n = 4). Each underwent pre-fatigue testing, an identical fatigue protocol, and post-fatigue testing. A second high oblique fracture line was tested identically with PHLP-9 (n = 4) and IMN (n = 4) constructs.

Results: Statistical analyses of transverse specimen pre-fatigue stiffness revealed that the PHLP-7 and PHLP-9 were stiffer in anteroposterior bending and torsion compared to the IMN. There was no difference between the three constructs in varus-valgus bending or compression. Post-fatigue stiffness comparisons revealed no difference between the three constructs. For the oblique fracture, pre-fatigue differences were found with the IMN stiffer in varus-valgus bending and the PHLP-9 stiffer in torsion.

Discussion: The biomechanical performance of an angular-stable proximal humeral nail design was comparable, especially following fatigue, to locked plate/screw constructs in a synthetic osteoporotic two-part surgical neck proximal humerus fracture model.

Keywords: biomechanics; intramedullary nail; locked; osteoporosis; proximal humerus fracture; proximal humerus locking plate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Synthes PHILOS proximal humerus locking plate. Note: The two screw holes left open in the PHLP-7 construct were from the row circled in red (row C) which, when placed, provide divergent screw fixation in the anterior and posterior regions of the mid-aspect of the humeral head and neck. The most distal screws, row E, provide fixation into the anterior and posterior aspects of the inferomedial humeral neck and have been shown to prevent loss of reduction and screw loosening.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Wright Medical Aequalis proximal humeral nail (IMN).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Radiograph of representative specimens. Note: Left—intramedullary nail; right—proximal humerus locking plate. Superimposed lines demonstrate fracture line position; (green line = “transverse” fracture line, red line = “oblique” fracture line).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Potting technique and set up of the tested specimens.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
The servohydraulic biomechanical testing set up of specimens.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Ph_FINAL. Note: Lack of tuberosity/proximal segment cortical fixation in the “oblique” fracture pattern leading to significant loosening of the fixation constructs during fatigue.

References

    1. Egol KA, Ong CC, Walsh M, et al. Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA Types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma 2008; 22: 159–164. - PubMed
    1. Südkamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 1320–1328. - PubMed
    1. Schumaier A, Grawe B. Proximal humerus fractures: evaluation and management in the elderly patient. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2018; 9: 2151458517750516. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hessmann MH, Hansen WSM, Krummenauer F, et al. Locked plate fixation and intramedullary nailing for proximal humerus fractures: a biomechanical evaluation. J Trauma 2005; 58: 1194–1201. - PubMed
    1. Owsley KC, Gorczyca JT. Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures [corrected]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 233–240. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources