Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 28:4:1536754.
doi: 10.3389/frtra.2025.1536754. eCollection 2025.

Deceased donor uterus transplantation: religious perceptions

Affiliations

Deceased donor uterus transplantation: religious perceptions

Jana Pittman et al. Front Transplant. .

Abstract

Background: Uterus transplant now offers an alternative deceased donation treatment option for women with uterine infertility. Limited research exists on religious opinions that may impact the addition of the uterus to current multi-organ deceased donor programs.

Objective: To explore the acceptability of uterus transplantation and deceased uterus donation across different religious groups.

Design: A cross-sectional survey of 2,497 participants was conducted between October 2022 and January 2023 in NSW Australia. Australia is a culturally and religiously diverse nation with over 60% of people identifying with a religion, including Christianity (43%), Islam (3.2%), Buddhism (2.7%), Hinduism (2.4%). This survey captured awareness and attitudes towards deceased uterus donation. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were used to explore factors influencing organ donation and next-of-kin perceptions.

Results: A total of 2,497 respondents completed the survey. Christians had greater awareness of organ donation but were less likely to be registered donors, or consent to uterus donation. Those of Hindu faith were less likely to be registered organ donors. Next-of-kin from the Islamic faith were reluctant to consent to organ donation if the donor's pre-death wishes were unknown, and less likely to consent to uterus donation. Participants identifying as Buddhist had a higher awareness of uterus transplantation.

Conclusion: Organ donor awareness and consent rates varied across religious groups, including for uterus donation. Differences may stem from varying beliefs about bodily integrity, and reproductive rights, which may influence attitudes toward uterus donation. Tailored culturally and linguistically sensitive educational campaigns should address the unique aspects of uterus donation.

Keywords: deceased donor; infertility; public perception; transplantation; uterus; uterus transplant; vascular composite allograft.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Brännström M, Tullius SG, Brucker S, Dahm-Kähler P, Flyckt R, Kisu I, et al. Registry of the international society of uterus transplantation: first report. Transplantation. (2023) 107(1):10–7. 10.1097/TP.0000000000004286 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brännström M, Racowsky C, Carbonnel M, Wu J, Gargiulo A, Adashi EY, et al. Uterus transplantation: from research, through human trials and into the future. Hum Reprod Update. (2023) 29(5):521–44. 10.1093/humupd/dmad012 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ayoubi JM, Carbonnel M, Racowsky C, de Ziegler D, Gargiulo A, Kvarnström N, et al. Evolving clinical challenges in uterus transplantation. Reprod Biomed Online. (2022) 45(5):947–60. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.06.020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Testa G, McKenna GJ, Wall A, Bayer J, Gregg AR, Warren AM, et al. Uterus transplant in women with absolute uterine-factor infertility. JAMA. (2024) 332(10):817–24. 10.1001/jama.2024.11679 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. (2004) 240(2):205–13. 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources