Fungicide Seed Coating Increases Emergence of Bluebunch Wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata) Under High-Fungal-Biomass Conditions
- PMID: 40094569
- PMCID: PMC11901652
- DOI: 10.3390/plants14050679
Fungicide Seed Coating Increases Emergence of Bluebunch Wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata) Under High-Fungal-Biomass Conditions
Abstract
Pathogenesis from soil- and seed-borne fungi can limit the survival and growth of native seeds and seedlings. Fungicides can combat fungal pathogens, but in some studies, fungicide treatments were ineffective at improving seedling emergence over untreated seed. Such studies suggest that low fungal presence due to dry conditions may be the cause of fungicide ineffectiveness in some years and sites. This study tested whether a fungicide treatment's effectiveness is indeed related to the amount of fungi in the soil. We compared the emergence and biomass produced from Pseudoroegneria spicata seed that was uncoated, coated with no active ingredient, and fungicide-coated, across five soil treatments promoting different levels of fungal biomass. For uncoated seed, both percent emergence and total biomass of seedlings were highest in autoclaved soil and declined when fungi were present, but the level of fungus did not impact emergence or biomass for fungicide-coated seed. When grown in autoclaved, untreated, or low-fungus soils, percent emergence and total biomass from fungicide-coated seeds were not significantly different from uncoated seeds. However, in medium- and high-fungus soils, the percent emergence and total biomass from fungicide-coated seeds were more than two times greater than uncoated seed (p < 0.05). These results indicate that fungicide treatments can be effective at increasing restoration success for P. spicata, but the effectiveness of the fungicide treatment depends on the microbial environment of the planting site.
Keywords: bluebunch wheatgrass; fungicide; rangeland restoration; seed coating; seed enhancement technology; seed pathogens; soil pathogens.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures



References
-
- Hardegree S.P., Abatzoglou J.T., Brunson M.W., Germino M.J., Hegewisch K.C., Moffet C.A., Pilliod D.S., Roundy B.A., Boehm A.R., Meredith G.R. Weather-centric rangeland revegetation planning. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2018;71:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.rama.2017.07.003. - DOI
-
- Arias M., Kariyat R., Wahl K., Mendez S., Chavana J., Christoffersen B. Do early-successional weeds facilitate or compete with seedlings in forest restoration? Disentangling abiotic versus biotic factors. Ecol. Solut. Evid. 2021;2:e12095. doi: 10.1002/2688-8319.12095. - DOI
-
- Madsen M.D., Davies K.W., Boyd C.S., Kerby J.D., Svejcar T.J. Emerging seed enhancement technologies for overcoming barriers to restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2016;24:S77–S84. doi: 10.1111/rec.12332. - DOI
-
- James J.J., Sheley R.L., Leger E.A., Adler P.B., Hardegree S.P., Gornish E.S., Rinella M.J. Increased soil temperature and decreased precipitation during early life stages constrain grass seedling recruitment in cold desert restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 2019;56:2609–2619. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13508. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources