The Impact of Setons on Perianal Fistula Outcomes in Patients With Crohn's Disease Treated With Anti-TNF Therapy: A Multicentre Study

Abstract

Background and aims: We aimed to assess the impact of setons on perianal fistula outcomes in patients with perianal fistulising Crohn's disease (PFCD) treated with anti-TNF therapy.

Methods: We included patients treated with their first anti-TNF therapy for PFCD after undergoing a pelvic MRI between 2005 and 2022 from 6 North American centres. Our exposure was one or more setons at the time of anti-TNF therapy. Our primary outcome was major adverse fistula outcome (MAFO), a composite of repeat local surgical intervention, hospitalisation, or faecal diversion for PFCD, and our secondary outcome was fistula remission defined clinically. We used 1:1 cardinality matching and propensity score weighting to control for fistula severity based on centrally read MRIs, luminal characteristics, and concomitant therapies.

Results: Our analysis included 221 patients: 81 with setons and 140 without setons. After cardinality matching, our cohorts were balanced (standardised difference < 0.1 for all covariates). Patients with setons had similar rates of MAFO (HR 1.23; 95% CI, 0.68-2.21) and fistula remission at 6 months (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.41-1.59) and 12 months (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.31-1.27) compared to patients without setons. Our results remained stable when analysed by propensity score weighting and in a sensitivity analysis of patients who underwent an exam under anaesthesia. In patients with abscesses, there were lower rates of MAFO (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.19-1.25) but not statistically significant in patients with setons.

Conclusions: In this multicentre, setons were not associated with improved fistula outcomes. Future prospective controlled studies are warranted.

Keywords: comparative effectiveness; multidisciplinary care; perianal fistula; setons.