Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 3:13:1502489.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1502489. eCollection 2025.

Noise-induced hearing loss in farmworkers: a scoping review

Laura Coco  1 , Marisa Fried  1 , Obdulia Loria  1 , Lluvia Vazquez  1 , Katherine Ekonomo  2 , Gabriela Sanchez  1 , Annie J Keeney  2 , Cheryl L Beseler  3
Affiliations

Noise-induced hearing loss in farmworkers: a scoping review

Laura Coco et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Objective: Farmworkers who have prolonged exposure to loud noise are at risk for disabling hearing loss. The objectives of this scoping review are to (1) identify and summarize the evidence on noise-induced hearing loss in farmworkers, (2) describe instruments used to evaluate hearing loss outcomes, (3) describe testing approaches and limitations, and (4) provide recommendations for future studies that seek to quantify hearing loss in this population.

Methods: We performed a systematic search of three electronic databases, PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus, to identify articles related to noise-related hearing loss in farmworkers. Our search was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines.

Results: A total of 57 articles met inclusion criteria. The majority of studies were undertaken in North America (n = 32, 56%), and most were in the midwestern United States. Farmworkers tended to be white, male, and work in crop agriculture. A total of 47 studies (82%) used audiometry to measure farmworkers' hearing sensitivity, among which testing was carried out at various locations, including hospitals, clinics, farmworkers' homes, and worksites. The criteria for defining hearing loss varied across studies making it difficult to summarize results. Among 14 studies that used a cutoff point greater than 25 decibels, the prevalence of hearing loss ranged between 46 and 98%. Subjective outcomes (used in 14 studies) were typically assessed using a variety of researcher-developed questions. The prevalence of hearing difficulties in this category was as high as 87%.

Conclusion: Hearing loss is prevalent across studies and does not appear to decrease over the years. Our findings call for more research among diverse farmworker populations. Further, given the high prevalence of hearing loss in many of the studies reviewed, there is clearly a need to develop strategies to protect farmworkers from noise exposure and noise-induced hearing loss.

Keywords: farmworkers; hearing conservation; noise-induced hearing loss; occupational health; scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of selection process for included studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of publications on noise-related hearing loss in farmworkers by year.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of publications by primary crop or animal.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Number of publications by country.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Number of publications by outcome measure category.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Distribution of publications by Pure Tone Average (PTA) thresholds (dB) used to define hearing loss.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rautiainen RH, Reynolds SJ. Mortality and morbidity in agriculture in the United States. J Agric Saf Health. (2002) 8:259–76. doi: 10.13031/2013.9054, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beckett WS, Chamberlain D, Hallman E, May J, Hwang S-A, Gomez M, et al. Hearing conservation for farmers: source apportionment of occupational and environmental factors contributing to hearing loss. J Occup Environ Med. (2000) 42:806–13. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200008000-00008, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murray-Johnson L, Witte K, Patel D, Orrego V, Zuckerman C, Maxfield AM, et al. Using the extended parallel process model to prevent noise-induced hearing loss among coal miners in Appalachia. Health Educ Behav. (2004) 31:741–55. doi: 10.1177/1090198104263396, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Plakke BL, Dare E. Occupational hearing loss in farmers. Public Health Rep. (1992) 107:188–92. PMID: - PMC - PubMed
    1. Depczynski J, Franklin RC, Challinor K, Williams W, Fragar LJ. Farm noise emissions during common agricultural activities. J Agric Saf Health. (2005) 11:325–34. doi: 10.13031/2013.18575 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources