Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 28;3(1):201-205.
doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2024.09.011. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Transcervical Endoscopic Esophageal Mobilization: An Approach to Transhiatal Esophagectomy

Affiliations

Transcervical Endoscopic Esophageal Mobilization: An Approach to Transhiatal Esophagectomy

Jennifer Livschitz et al. Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. .

Abstract

Background: Transcervical endoscopic esophageal mobilization (TEEM) is an approach to transhiatal esophagectomy that aims to minimize blood loss and decrease the operative time commonly associated with traditional transhiatal technique.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent TEEM esophagectomy between 2009 and 2020. Baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative complications were recorded. To report survival, a Kaplan-Meier survival plot was developed using SAS software (SAS Institute).

Results: A total of 241 patients underwent TEEM esophagectomy. The mean operative time was 185.1 ± 59.3 minutes, blood loss was 251.4 ± 212.3 mL, the number lymph nodes dissected was 13.6 ± 6.2, and the length of stay was 11.9 ± 8.5 days. In the postoperative setting, 68 (28.2%) patients experienced hoarseness, 62 (25.7%) had postoperative atrial fibrillation, 30 (12.4%) had an anastomotic leak, and 12 (4.6%) experienced chylothorax. The overall 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 2.1% (5 of 241) and 4.6% (11 of 241), respectively. The median overall survival was 2.36 years, with 60% 3-year survival and 40% 5-year survival.

Conclusions: TEEM esophagectomy is a safe approach with acceptable postoperative morbidity and mortality and shorter operative times compared with historical norms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
View of the anterior dissection plan at the level of the carina. The esophagus lies posterior to the dissector. (L, left.)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Completed posterior dissection at the level of the midesophagus, including a view of the descending aorta. The esophagus lies anterior to the scope hood. (V., vein.)
Figure 3
Figure 3
There was a median survival of 2.36 years, 3-year overall survival was 60.1%, and 5-year overall survival was 40.5%. The CI is 95%.
Supplementary Figure 1
Supplementary Figure 1

References

    1. Almhanna K., Weber J., Shridhar R., Hoffe S., Strosberg J., Meredith K. Determining the optimal number of lymph nodes harvested during esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016;7:387–394. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kato H., Nakajima M. Treatments for esophageal cancer: a review. Genl Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;61:330–335. - PubMed
    1. Xu Q.L., Li H., Zhu Y.J., Xu G. The treatments and postoperative complications of esophageal cancer: a review. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;15:163. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nguyen N.T., Follette D.M., Wolfe B.M., Schneider P.D., Roberts P., Goodnight J.E., Jr. Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg. 2000;135:920–925. - PubMed
    1. Hulscher J.B., Tijssen J.G., Obertop H., van Lanschot J.J. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:306–313. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources