Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Mar 18;45(1):111.
doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03500-x.

Oculomics approaches using retinal imaging to predict mental health disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Oculomics approaches using retinal imaging to predict mental health disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hong Kyu Kim et al. Int Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of oculomics approaches, including deep learning, machine learning, and logistic regression models, in detecting major mental disorders using retinal imaging.

Methods: A systematic review identified 11 studies for inclusion. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, revealing a high risk of bias, particularly in patient selection and index test design. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were estimated using random-effects models, and diagnostic performance was evaluated through a summary receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results: The analysis included 13 diagnostic models across 11 studies, covering major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and autism spectrum disorder using color fundus photography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT), and OCT angiography. The pooled sensitivity was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.78-0.94), and specificity was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.74-0.95). The pooled area under the curve was 0.904, indicating high diagnostic accuracy. However, all studies exhibited a high risk of bias, primarily due to case-control study designs, lack of external validation, and selection bias in 77% of studies. Some models showed signs of overfitting, likely due to small sample sizes, insufficient validation, or dataset limitations. Additionally, no distinct retinal patterns specific to mental disorders were identified.

Conclusion: While oculomics demonstrates potential for detecting mental disorders through retinal imaging, significant methodological limitations, including high bias, overfitting risks, and the absence of disease-specific retinal biomarkers, limit its current clinical applicability. Future research should focus on large-scale, externally validated studies with prospective designs to establish reliable retinal markers for psychiatric diagnosis.

Keywords: Machine learning; Mental disorders; Oculomics; Retinal imaging; Selection bias.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: As this study utilized existing published literature, it was exempt from ethical review. This study was performed in accordance with ethical principles that are consistent with the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent to participate: Not applicable.

Similar articles

References

    1. Vigo D, Thornicroft G, Atun R (2016) Estimating the true global burden of mental illness. The Lancet Psychiatry 3:171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00505-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Solmi M, Song M, Yon DK et al (2022) Incidence, prevalence, and global burden of autism spectrum disorder from 1990 to 2019 across 204 countries. Mol Psychiatry 27:4172–4180. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01630-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mandal PK, Gaur S, Roy RG et al (2022) Schizophrenia, bipolar and major depressive disorders: overview of clinical features, neurotransmitter alterations, pharmacological interventions, and impact of oxidative stress in the disease process. ACS Chem Neurosci 13:2784–2802. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00420 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stein DJ, Shoptaw SJ, Vigo DV et al (2022) Psychiatric diagnosis and treatment in the 21st century: paradigm shifts versus incremental integration. World Psychiatry 21:393–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20998 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lord O, Malone D, Mitchell AJ (2010) Receipt of preventive medical care and medical screening for patients with mental illness: a comparative analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 32:519–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.04.004 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources