Research on establishment decision of medical equipment measurement standard based on GDM-AHP
- PMID: 40102599
- PMCID: PMC11920080
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-94546-5
Research on establishment decision of medical equipment measurement standard based on GDM-AHP
Abstract
The problems in the current medical equipment measurement work have made many medical institutions begin to consider establishing a convenient, long-term stable and low-cost measurement service model by establishing internal measurement standards, but they have not made further in-depth exploration and the construction of a perfect measurement standard to establish a feasibility evaluation system. This study aims to construct a feasibility evaluation system for establishing measurement standards based on the Group Decision Making-Analytical Hierarchy Processes and provide a reference basis for decision-making in the establishment of measurement standards for medical equipment. A feasibility evaluation system for the establishment of measurement standards based on Group Decision Making-Analytical Hierarchy Processes is constructed, which includes 5 main criteria-level evaluation indicators and 14 sub-criteria-level evaluation indicators. The relative weights of the criteria-level evaluation indicators are calculated by constructing a judgment matrix through pairwise comparisons of the evaluation indicators using the Saaty scale method. Additionally, sensitivity analysis of the constructed model is conducted using the perturbation method. Then, we applied the constructed evaluation system to the feasibility evaluation of establishing measurement standards for eight different types of medical equipment in seven medical institutions. Differences in medical institutions and categories of medical equipment both have an impact on the values of the feasibility indicators for the establishment of measurement standards for medical equipment. The results of this study show that, the feasibility evaluation system for establishing measurement standards based on Group Decision Making-Analytical Hierarchy Processes can transform the problem of exploring the feasibility of establishing measurement standards in medical institutions into a multi-indicator quantitative evaluation problem, making the difficult-to-quantify decision-making process more scientific and objective.
Keywords: Evaluation system; Feasibility; Group decision Making-Analytical hierarchy processes; Measurement standards.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures






Similar articles
-
[Research on Cost Control and Rationalization Application Supervision of Medical Equipment Consumables Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process].Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi. 2023 Nov 30;47(6):702-705. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.2023.06.022. Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi. 2023. PMID: 38086733 Chinese.
-
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024. PMID: 38309959 Chinese.
-
A decision-making framework for evaluating medical equipment suppliers under uncertainty.Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 21;15(1):9858. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93389-4. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40119044 Free PMC article.
-
Metrological traceability of calibration in the estimation and use of common medical decision-making criteria.Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004;42(7):842-50. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2004.138. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004. PMID: 15327021 Review.
-
An Integrated MCDM Model for Conveyor Equipment Evaluation and Selection in an FMC Based on a Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy ARAS in the Presence of Vagueness.PLoS One. 2016 Apr 12;11(4):e0153222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153222. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27070543 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Yang, S. L. & Wu, Z. H. Measurement of entrepreneurs’ marketization courses. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management Science and Engineering, Atlanta, Ga, 15–17 Aug 2003; pp. 2494–2499. (2003).
-
- Witkovsky, V., Wimmer, G., Durisova, Z., Duris, S. & Palencar, R. Brief Overview of Methods for Measurement Uncertainty Analysis: GUM Uncertainty Framework, Monte Carlo Method, Characteristic Function Approach. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Measurement, Smolenice, SLOVAKIA, 29–31 May ; pp. 35–38. (2017).
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources