Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 18;15(1):9309.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94546-5.

Research on establishment decision of medical equipment measurement standard based on GDM-AHP

Affiliations

Research on establishment decision of medical equipment measurement standard based on GDM-AHP

Fei Weng et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The problems in the current medical equipment measurement work have made many medical institutions begin to consider establishing a convenient, long-term stable and low-cost measurement service model by establishing internal measurement standards, but they have not made further in-depth exploration and the construction of a perfect measurement standard to establish a feasibility evaluation system. This study aims to construct a feasibility evaluation system for establishing measurement standards based on the Group Decision Making-Analytical Hierarchy Processes and provide a reference basis for decision-making in the establishment of measurement standards for medical equipment. A feasibility evaluation system for the establishment of measurement standards based on Group Decision Making-Analytical Hierarchy Processes is constructed, which includes 5 main criteria-level evaluation indicators and 14 sub-criteria-level evaluation indicators. The relative weights of the criteria-level evaluation indicators are calculated by constructing a judgment matrix through pairwise comparisons of the evaluation indicators using the Saaty scale method. Additionally, sensitivity analysis of the constructed model is conducted using the perturbation method. Then, we applied the constructed evaluation system to the feasibility evaluation of establishing measurement standards for eight different types of medical equipment in seven medical institutions. Differences in medical institutions and categories of medical equipment both have an impact on the values of the feasibility indicators for the establishment of measurement standards for medical equipment. The results of this study show that, the feasibility evaluation system for establishing measurement standards based on Group Decision Making-Analytical Hierarchy Processes can transform the problem of exploring the feasibility of establishing measurement standards in medical institutions into a multi-indicator quantitative evaluation problem, making the difficult-to-quantify decision-making process more scientific and objective.

Keywords: Evaluation system; Feasibility; Group decision Making-Analytical hierarchy processes; Measurement standards.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The technical roadmap for constructing a model based on GDM-AHP.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Change in the proportion of the feasibility evaluation index R value range for the establishment of medical equipment metrological standards when the weight of relevant technical personnel configuration indicator increases.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Change in the proportion of the feasibility evaluation index R value range for the establishment of medical equipment metrological standards when the weight of mandatory calibration equipment indicator increases.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Change in the proportion of the feasibility evaluation index R value range for the establishment of medical equipment metrological standards when the weight of measurement operation skills indicator increases.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Change in the proportion of the feasibility evaluation index R value range for the establishment of medical equipment metrological standards when the weight of calibration work efficiency indicator increases.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Change in the proportion of the feasibility evaluation index R value range for the establishment of medical equipment metrological standards when the weight of economic level indicator increases.

Similar articles

References

    1. Yang, S. L. & Wu, Z. H. Measurement of entrepreneurs’ marketization courses. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management Science and Engineering, Atlanta, Ga, 15–17 Aug 2003; pp. 2494–2499. (2003).
    1. Acero, R., Santolaria, J., Brau, A. & Pueo, M. Virtual distances methodology as verification technique for AACMMs with a capacitive sensor based indexed metrology platform. Sensors16, 1940 (2016). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Witkovsky, V., Wimmer, G., Durisova, Z., Duris, S. & Palencar, R. Brief Overview of Methods for Measurement Uncertainty Analysis: GUM Uncertainty Framework, Monte Carlo Method, Characteristic Function Approach. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Measurement, Smolenice, SLOVAKIA, 29–31 May ; pp. 35–38. (2017).
    1. Pathak, R. et al. A. A data-driven statistical model that estimates measurement uncertainty improves interpretation of ADC reproducibility: a multi-site study of liver metastases. Sci. Rep.7, 14084 (2017). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li, J. S., Mao, Y. J. & Zhang, J. Maintenance and Quality Control of Medical Equipment Based on Information Fusion Technology. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022, 9333328. (2022). - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources