Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):1050.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22170-z.

Effectiveness of wearable activity trackers on physical activity among adolescents in school-based settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xiaoyu Chen  1   2 , Fengyi Wang  1   2 , Huiqing Zhang  3 , Yang Lin  1   2 , Shijie Zhu  1   2 , Yonghong Yang  4   5
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness of wearable activity trackers on physical activity among adolescents in school-based settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xiaoyu Chen et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: While inactivity and sedentarism among adolescents are increasing globally, technology-based interventions incorporating wearable activity trackers (WATs) demonstrate the potential to combat the situation. With a focus on schools as critical environments in which to perform interventions among adolescents, this meta-analytic review of literature aimed to examine the effectiveness of wearable trackers in objectively measured physical activity (PA).

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across six databases-PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, the Web of Science Core Collection, and PsycINFO-between January 2012 and March 2024. The language was restricted to English only. Both randomized controlled trials and quasi-experiment studies were included. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB2 and ROBINS-I tools. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed. Effect direction for a narrative synthesis was also conducted. GRADE criteria were applied to assess quality of evidence.

Results: Fifteen studies were finally included in the literature review, and ten were adopted for meta-analysis. No statistical significance was found in intervention outcomes involving WATs' effect on PA, whether in terms of total daily steps, moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), or calorie counts. However, the subgroup analysis revealed that one study using research-grade assessment showed a substantial positive effect on steps. There were no data reported regarding the effect of objectively measured sedentary behavior.

Conclusion: Further study is needed to explore whether wearable activity trackers raise or decrease PA among adolescents in schools.

Registration: PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42023421008.

Keywords: Adolescents; Physical activity; Schools; Wearable activity trackers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow of study selection from Covidence
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias assessment results based on study type. a risk of bias assessment result of the RCT study; b risk of bias assessment results of the CRCT studies; c risk of bias assessment results of non RCT studies (quasi-experimental studies and pre-post experimental studies without control group). Citation: McGuinness, LA, Higgins, JPT. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Syn Meth. 2020; 1- 7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1411
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plots based on outcomes
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carrasquilla GD, García-Ureña M, Fall T, Sørensen TI, Kilpeläinen TO. Mendelian randomization suggests a bidirectional, causal relationship between physical inactivity and adiposity. Elife. 2022;11:e70386. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hermelink R, Leitzmann MF, Markozannes G, Tsilidis K, Pukrop T, Berger F, et al. Sedentary behavior and cancer–an umbrella review and meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2022;37:447–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ekelund U, Tarp J, Steene-Johannessen J, Hansen BH, Jefferis B, Fagerland MW, et al. Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;366:l4570. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fang H, Jing Y, Chen J, Wu Y, Wan Y. Recent trends in sedentary time: a systematic literature review. Healthcare. 2021;9:969. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e1077–86. - PubMed