Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):183.
doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03755-9.

The impact of inter-hospital transfer on outcomes in lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective cohort analysis

Ali Jaan #  1 , Zouina Sarfraz #  2 , Adeena Maryyum  3 , Umer Farooq  4 , Muhammad Farhan Ashraf  5 , Fatima Warraich  5 , Mark S Mcfarland  5 , Jason Gutman  5 , Karin Dunnigan  5
Affiliations

The impact of inter-hospital transfer on outcomes in lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective cohort analysis

Ali Jaan et al. BMC Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Background: This study investigates the role of interhospital transfer (IHT) in lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) management and its impact on patient outcomes, focusing on mortality rates, complication occurrences, procedural performance, and resource utilization in patients diagnosed with LGIB.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from the National Inpatient Sample database from 2017 to 2020. It included adult patients diagnosed with LGIB, assessing the impact of IHT on outcomes such as mortality, complication rates, procedural performance, and resource utilization. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and adjusted mean differences (AMD) were used to evaluate these impacts.

Results: A total of 393,495 LGIB patients were analyzed, with 31,565 (8.02%) undergoing interhospital transfer. Transferred patients exhibited significantly higher inpatient mortality (AOR 1.96, P < 0.01). They also faced increased risks of acute kidney injury (AOR 1.32, P < 0.01), septic shock (AOR 2.11, P < 0.01), and intensive care unit admission (AOR: 2.61, P < 0.01). These patients were more likely to undergo interventional radiology-guided embolization (AOR 2.68, P < 0.01) and showed variations in colonoscopy procedures. Resource utilization was also higher among transferred patients, with an increased mean length of hospital stay by 4.37 days (P < 0.01) and higher hospitalization charges (mean difference $61,239, P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Interhospital transfer in LGIB patients is associated with increased mortality, greater resource utilization, and the need for more specialized procedural interventions. Enhanced clinical vigilance and tailored resource allocation for transferred LGIB patients are necessary. Future research should optimize care strategies for these high-risk patients.

Keywords: Hospitalization; Interhospital transfer; Lower Gastrointestinal bleeding; National inpatient sample; Patient outcomes; Resource utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study did not involve primary data collection from human participants, as it exclusively utilized secondary data from publicly available sources (the National Inpatient Sample Database), which are de-identified and exempt from requiring ethical approval. While ethical approval for the use of this dataset was sought by the Office of Human Research Protection Rochester Rochester Health, the study was deemed exempt from full review due to the nature of the data. All research activities were conducted in compliance with relevant ethical guidelines, including the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram depicting the inclusion and exclusion of patients with LGIB
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Procedural performance in LGIB among transferred and non-transferred patients
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Wuerth BA, Rockey DC. Changing epidemiology of upper Gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the last decade: a nationwide analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2018;63:1286–93. - PubMed
    1. Van Leerdam ME. Epidemiology of acute upper Gastrointestinal bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;22(2):209–24. - PubMed
    1. Adegboyega T, Rivadeneira D, Lower. GI bleeding: an update on incidences and causes. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2020;33(01):28–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Isa HM, Alkharsi FA, Ebrahim HA, Walwil KJ, Diab JA, Alkowari NM. Causes of Gastrointestinal bleeding in children based on endoscopic evaluation at a tertiary care center in Bahrain. World J Gastrointest Endoscopy. 2023;15(4):297. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ACG. Lower Gastrointestinal (GI) Bleeding. [cited 2024 Jan 26]. Available from: https://gi.org/topics/lower-gi-bleeding/

LinkOut - more resources