Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 18;20(1):291.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05652-z.

The effect of surgery for multipleligament knee injuries on patellar position and patellofemoral function: a retrospective study

Affiliations

The effect of surgery for multipleligament knee injuries on patellar position and patellofemoral function: a retrospective study

Yuanping Liao et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Background: Patients who undergo reconstruction for multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) often exhibit knee instability and poor overall knee function during postoperative follow-up. This may be related to the changes in patellar position and decline in patellofemoral function after surgery.

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes following reconstruction of MLKIs through the assessment of: (1) changes in patellar height; (2) anatomical changes in patellofemoral alignment, such as tilt or displacement; and (3) functional outcomes of the patellofemoral joint.

Methods: This retrospective study included 45 patients who underwent reconstruction for MLKIs at our hospital between November 2015 and September 2022, with complete data and meeting the inclusion criteria. These patients formed the case group. An additional 20 outpatients without ligament injuries or patellar dislocation were selected as the normal control group. Patellar height changes in the case group were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using the Caton-Deschamps (CD) and Insall-Salvati (IS) indices on lateral X-rays. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to measure patellofemoral alignment parameters in both groups, including the sulcus angle (SA), patellar tilt angle (PTA), lateral patellofemoral angle (LPA), congruence angle (CA), and patellofemoral index (PI), to evaluate patellofemoral positioning. Additionally, the Kujala score questionnaire was used to assess the stability function of the patellofemoral joint.

Results: Preoperative patellar height in the case group, measured by the CD and IS indices, was (1.07 ± 0.10, 1.10 ± 0.09), showing a statistically significant difference when compared to postoperative measurements (0.96 ± 0.13, 1.05 ± 0.10) (P < 0.05). However, postoperative patellofemoral alignment parameters, including SA, PTA, LPA, CA, and PI, in the case group showed no statistically significant differences compared to the control group (P > 0.05). At the latest follow-up, the patellofemoral function score in the case group was (89.0 ± 5.3), which was not significantly different from the control group (91.0 ± 2.9) (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: After reconstruction of MLKIs, patellar height decreased but remained within the normal range. Patellofemoral alignment was well-maintained, and patellofemoral function was maintained.

Keywords: Multiligament knee injuries; Patellar height; Patellofemoral function; Patellofemoral position.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital, Henan Province. The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patella Height Measurement. Note: a Caton-Deschamps index; b Insall-Salvati index
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Magnetic resonance images demonstrating the measurements of the indices to assess Patellofemoral Position. a sulcus angle; b patellofemoral index(A/b); c patellar tilt angle; d lateral patellofemoral angle; e congruence angle
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Patient flow through the study
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean Kujala scores (± SD) in patients with case group and control group

Similar articles

References

    1. Ali AA, Abdelwahab MB. Short-term outcome of multi-ligament knee injury among sudanese patients. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7:1486–93. 10.3889/oamjms.2019.282. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braaten JA, Schreier FJ, Rodriguez AN, Monson J, LaPrade RF. Modern treatment principles for multiligament knee injuries. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022. 10.22038/ABJS.2021.60188.2971. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li T, Xiong Y, Zhang Z, Tang X, Chen G, Li Q, Fu WL, Li J. Results of multiple ligament reconstruction after knee dislocation—A prospective study with 95 patients and minimum 2-year follow up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021. 10.1186/s12891-021-04596-9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flandry F, Hommel G. Normal anatomy and biomechanics of the knee. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2011. 10.1097/JSA.0b013e318210c0aa. - PubMed
    1. Khan MJ, Asif N, Sharma A, Siddiqui YS, Khan AQ. Single-stage versus two-stage reconstruction in chronic multi ligament knee injury. Int J Burns Trauma. 2022;12(2):35. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms