Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 17:11:20552076251326223.
doi: 10.1177/20552076251326223. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

Automated program using convolutional neural networks for objective and reproducible selection of corneal confocal microscopy images

Affiliations

Automated program using convolutional neural networks for objective and reproducible selection of corneal confocal microscopy images

Qincheng Qiao et al. Digit Health. .

Abstract

Objective: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of diabetes, posing a significant risk for foot ulcers and amputation. Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, noninvasive method to assess DPN by analysing corneal nerve fibre morphology. However, selecting high-quality representative images remains a critical challenge.

Methods: In this study, we propose a fully automated CCM image-selection algorithm based on deep learning feature extraction using ResNet-18 and unsupervised clustering. The algorithm consistently identifies representative images by balancing non-redundancy and representativeness, ensuring objectivity and reproducibility.

Results: When validated against manual selection by researchers with varying expertise levels, the algorithm demonstrated superior performance in distinguishing DPN and reduced inter-observer variability. It completed the analysis of hundreds of images within 1 s, significantly enhancing diagnostic efficiency. Compared with traditional manual selection, the proposed method achieved higher diagnostic accuracy for key morphological parameters, including corneal nerve fibre density, length, and branch density.

Conclusion: The algorithm is open source and compatible with standard CCM workflows, offering researchers and clinicians a robust and efficient tool for DPN diagnosis. Further, multicentre studies are needed to validate these findings in diverse populations.

Keywords: Deep learning; confocal microscopy; diabetic neuropathy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The overall design process and graphic summary of this study.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Example of CCM image quality classification. Image A is considered a high-quality image, while the remaining images, B, C, and D, are regarded as low-quality. (A) The nerve fibres are clear, with a distinct contrast against the background. (B) The centre of the image shows an indentation caused by excessive contact of the lens with the cornea, leading to discontinuity of the nerve fibres. (C) The rapid movement of the eyeball causes distortion in the image, preventing an accurate representation of the nerve fibre morphology. (D) The majority of the image is focused on the corneal endothelium, failing to display the nerve plexus beneath the base. CCM: corneal confocal microscopy.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
ROC curve analysis of diagnostic performance for DPN using different feature fusion weights. DPN: diabetic peripheral neuropathy; ROC: receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Diagnostic performance of automated selecting using AiCCM for DPN. DPN: diabetic peripheral neuropathy; AiCCM: AiCCMetrics.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Diagnostic performance of automated selecting using ACCM for DPN. DPN: diabetic peripheral neuropathy; ACCM: ACCMetrics.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Comparison of classification performance between automated and manual selecting for DPN diagnosis. DPN: diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, et al. IDF Diabetes atlas: global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2022; 183: 109119. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feldman EL, Callaghan BC, Pop-Busui R, et al. Diabetic neuropathy. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2019; 5: 41. - PubMed
    1. Yang H, Sloan G, Ye Y, et al. New perspective in diabetic neuropathy: from the periphery to the brain, a call for early detection, and precision medicine. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019; 10: 929. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alam U, Anson M, Meng Y, et al. Artificial intelligence and corneal confocal microscopy: the start of a beautiful relationship. J Clin Med 2022; 11: 6199. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferdousi M, Kalteniece A, Azmi S, et al. Diagnosis of neuropathy and risk factors for corneal nerve loss in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a corneal confocal microscopy study. Diabetes Care 2021; 44: 150–156. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources