Recommendations for mobile apps for mental health treatment: Qualitative interviews with psychiatrists
- PMID: 40103639
- PMCID: PMC11915247
- DOI: 10.1177/20552076251325951
Recommendations for mobile apps for mental health treatment: Qualitative interviews with psychiatrists
Abstract
Background: The number of mobile apps tailored for people living with mental health conditions has increased tremendously. However, the majority of the existing apps are not evidence-based and are being developed by teams without mental health expertise.
Objective: We aimed to explore psychiatrists' perceptions of what they and their patients need in a mental health app and eventually inform the design of future mobile apps in this area.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with psychiatrists (N = 18) from three European countries: Austria, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia. Content analysis using inductive and deductive coding was used to analyze the interviews.
Results: Four major themes were deductively identified: current system, gaps in the current system, recommendations for a mobile app, and promoting app use. Psychiatrists provided a comprehensive list of app features they suggested would be helpful. Of particular importance seemed to be enabling patients to self-monitor various aspects of their lives and including an emergency plan. Participants also emphasized that the app should be positive and motivating for patients to use, with some suggesting that users be able to communicate with other users for support. Within the theme of "current system," a common topic was the current shortage of psychiatrists and the feelings of time pressure amongst existing psychiatrists.
Conclusions: The results of this study can be used by software developers to inform future designs of mental health mobile apps, which will hopefully translate to a greater availability of evidence-based apps that address clinical needs.
Keywords: Mental health; app content; app design; mHealth; mobile app; patients; psychiatrists; qualitative.
© The Author(s) 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Perspectives and Needs of Malaysian Patients With Diabetes for a Mobile Health App Support on Self-Management of Diabetes: Qualitative Study.JMIR Diabetes. 2023 Oct 23;8:e40968. doi: 10.2196/40968. JMIR Diabetes. 2023. PMID: 37870903 Free PMC article.
-
The Reviews Are in: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Consumer Perspectives on Apps for Bipolar Disorder.J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 7;19(4):e105. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7273. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 28389420 Free PMC article.
-
Enabling Psychiatrists to be Mobile Phone App Developers: Insights Into App Development Methodologies.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Nov 11;2(4):e53. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3425. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014. PMID: 25486985 Free PMC article.
-
User perceptions of mobile digital apps for mental health: Acceptability and usability - An integrative review.J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Feb;29(1):147-168. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12744. Epub 2021 Mar 18. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022. PMID: 33604946 Review.
-
Mobile Apps for Medication Management: Review and Analysis.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Sep 11;7(9):e13608. doi: 10.2196/13608. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 31512580 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Mental health atlas 2020. World Health Organization. 2021. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/345946
-
- Firth J, Torous J, Nicholas J, et al. Can smartphone mental health interventions reduce symptoms of anxiety? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Affective Disord 2017; 218: 15–22. - PubMed
-
- Ebert DD, Van Daele T, Nordgreen T, et al. Internet- and mobile-based psychological interventions: applications, efficacy, and potential for improving mental health. Eur Psychol 2018; 23: 167–187.
-
- Gindidis S, Stewart S, Roodenburg J. A systematic scoping review of adolescent mental health treatment using mobile apps. Adv Ment Health 2019; 17: 161–177.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources