Sex-related differences in genetically determined Alzheimer's disease
- PMID: 40103931
- PMCID: PMC11913828
- DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1522434
Sex-related differences in genetically determined Alzheimer's disease
Abstract
We reviewed the literature on sex differences in genetically determined Alzheimer's disease (AD), focusing on autosomal dominant AD (ADAD), Down syndrome-associated AD (DSAD), and APOE4 homozygosity, particularly regarding disease penetrance, symptom onset and clinical progression, and trajectories for markers of amyloidosis (A), tau pathology (T) and neurodegeneration (N). Data suggests that sex differences in disease penetrance, symptom onset, and AT(N) biomarker trajectories are typically subtle for genetically determined AD populations. Noteworthy exceptions, such as increased neurodegeneration in later stages of the disease in females while similar cognitive outcomes, suggest a potential differential cognitive reserve that warrants further investigation. Additionally, the interaction between APOE genotype and sex reveals complex and multifaceted effects in DSAD, with potential implications for ADAD that remain underexplored. The smaller sex differences observed compared to sporadic AD offer insights into the different underlying disease mechanisms in genetically determined AD populations. Future research should prioritize sex-specific investigations in genetically determined AD, focusing on refining methodologies. This includes prioritizing longitudinal designs, adjustment for key confounders, and adherence to sex-specific guidelines.
Keywords: AT(N) biomarker trajectories in Alzheimer’s disease (amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration biomarkers); apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 (APOE4) homozygosity; autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease (ADAD); disease penetrance in Alzheimer’s disease; down syndrome-associated Alzheimer’s disease (DS-AD); genetically determined Alzheimer’s disease; sex differences in Alzheimer’s disease; symptom onset in Alzheimer’s disease.
Copyright © 2025 Del Hoyo Soriano, Wagemann, Bejanin, Levin and Fortea.
Conflict of interest statement
JF has received personal fees for service on advisory boards, adjudication committees, or speaker honoraria from AC Immune, Adamed, Alzheon, Biogen, Eisai, Esteve, Fujirebio, Ionis, Laboratorios Carnot, Life Molecular Imaging, Lilly, Lundbeck, Perha, and Roche, outside the submitted work. JF also holds a patent for markers of synaptopathy in neurodegenerative disease (licensed to Adx, EPI8382175.0). JL reports speaker fees from Bayer Vital, Biogen, EISAI, TEVA, Zambon, Esteve, Merck and Roche, consulting fees from Axon Neuroscience, EISAI and Biogen, author fees from Thieme medical publishers and W. Kohlhammer GmbH medical publishers and is inventor in a patent “Oral Phenylbutyrate for Treatment of Human 4-Repeat Tauopathies” (PCT/EP2024/053388) filed by LMU Munich. In addition, JL reports compensation for serving as chief medical officer for MODAG GmbH is beneficiary of the phantom share program of MODAG GmbH and is inventor in a patent “Pharmaceutical Composition and Methods of Use” (EP 22 159 408.8) filed by MODAG GmbH, all activities outside the submitted work. The other authors report no relevant disclosures. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling editor SG declared a past collaboration with the author JF.
Figures



References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous