Weekly Biological Variation of Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio and Urine Specific Gravity in Healthy Dogs
- PMID: 40105000
- PMCID: PMC11920809
- DOI: 10.1111/jvim.70052
Weekly Biological Variation of Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio and Urine Specific Gravity in Healthy Dogs
Abstract
Background: Urine protein-creatinine ratio (UPC) and urine specific gravity (USG) are important measurements in the determination of renal proteinuria and chronic kidney disease. Biological and analytical variation estimates of these analytes to calculate the index of individuality (IoI) and a reference change value (RCV) are important to determine whether a population-based reference interval can be used to detect clinically meaningful changes and facilitate the interpretation of serial measurements.
Objective: Determine the biological variation of UPC and USG using calculations of RCV and IoI in healthy dogs.
Animals: Eleven healthy client-owned young adult dogs.
Methods: Prospective observational study. First-morning urine samples were collected by voiding once weekly for 6 consecutive weeks for batch analysis. Twenty random samples were run in duplicate. Urine protein concentration, urine creatinine concentration, and USG were measured using a colorimetric pyrogallol red molybdate complex, enzymatic Jaffe method, and manual refractometer, respectively. Restricted maximum likelihood estimations were used to determine within-individual, between-individual, and analytical coefficients of variation and calculation of RCV and IoI.
Results: All dogs were non-proteinuric at enrollment (UPC < 0.2) and remained non-proteinuric on subsequent measurements. Urine protein concentration, urine creatinine concentration, UPC, and USG had intermediate individuality. The RCV was 73% for urine protein concentration, 68% for urine creatinine concentration, 31% for UPC, and 3% for USG.
Conclusion: Population-based reference intervals for UPC and USG should be interpreted cautiously for single measurements and calculated RCVs should be applied to serial measurements to identify clinically meaningful changes.
Keywords: biological variation; urine; urine protein‐creatinine ratio; urine specific gravity.
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors declare no off‐label use of antimicrobials.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures


References
-
- Grauer G. F., Thomas C. B., and Eicker S. W., “Estimation of Quantitative Proteinuria in the Dog, Using the Urine Protein‐To‐Creatinine Ratio From a Random, Voided Sample,” American Journal of Veterinary Research 46, no. 10 (1985): 2116–2119. - PubMed
-
- Center S. A., Wilkinson E., Smith C. A., Erb H., and Lewis R. M., “24‐Hour Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio in Dogs With Protein‐Losing Nephropathies,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 187, no. 8 (1985): 820–824. - PubMed
-
- Fettman M. J., “Comparison of Urinary Protein Concentration and Protein/Creatinine Ratio vs Routine Microscopy in Urinalysis of Dogs: 500 Cases (1987‐1988),” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 195, no. 7 (1989): 972–976. - PubMed
-
- Lees G. E., Brown S. A., Elliott J., Grauer G. E., Vaden S. L., and American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine , “Assessment and Management of Proteinuria in Dogs and Cats: 2004 ACVIM Forum Consensus Statement (Small Animal),” Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 19, no. 3 (2005): 377–385. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources