Emerging protein sequencing technologies: proteomics without mass spectrometry?

Abstract

Introduction: Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has been a leading method for proteomics for 30 years. Advantages provided by LC-MS/MS are offset by significant disadvantages, including cost. Recently, several non-mass spectrometric methods have emerged, but little information is available about their capacity to analyze the complex mixtures routine for mass spectrometry.

Areas covered: We review recent non-mass-spectrometric methods for sequencing proteins and peptides, including those using nanopores, sequencing by degradation, reverse translation, and short-epitope mapping, with comments on bioinformatics challenges, fundamental limitations, and areas where new technologies will be more or less competitive with LC-MS/MS. In addition to conventional literature searches, instrument vendor websites, patents, webinars, and preprints were also consulted to give a more up-to-date picture.

Expert opinion: Many new technologies are promising. However, demonstrations that they outperform mass spectrometry in terms of peptides and proteins identified have not yet been published, and astute observers note important disadvantages, especially relating to the dynamic range of single-molecule measurements of complex mixtures. Still, even if the performance of emerging methods proves inferior to LC-MS/MS, their low cost could create a different kind of revolution: a dramatic increase in the number of biology laboratories engaging in new forms of proteomics research.

Keywords: Bioinformatics; Edman degradation; fluorosequencing; nanopores; next-generation proteomics; non-mass spectrometry proteomics; protein sequencing.