Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Mar 19;19(3):e0012874.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012874. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Incidence, risk factors, and control of Rabies in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Incidence, risk factors, and control of Rabies in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Belay Tafa Regassa et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Globally, rabies is found in several geographical areas, with tens of thousands of deaths annually, mainly in developing countries. However, though Ethiopia is highly endemic for rabies, the overall risk of rabies has not yet been estimated. Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at estimating a pooled incidence rate of human exposure to suspected rabid animals as well as the incidence rates of rabies in humans and other domestic animals.

Methods: Published articles search was systematically performed through PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify the available studies on rabies until October 2023. The Joanna Brigg's Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklists were used for assessing the quality of the studies. The PRISMA 2020 guideline was followed. A qualitative synthesis was made describing the characteristics of the included studies. The quantitative synthesis was performed with a random effects model using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) version 3.0 software. The Q statistic quantified by I2 was used to check for heterogeneity among the included studies. To explain the source of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis was performed. Egger's regression test was used to evaluate publication biases. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023468791.

Results: For this study, a total of 439 articles were retrieved; of which fifteen studies were included in the final review. The annual pooled incidence rate of human exposure to suspected rabid animals was 33.65 (95% CI: 31.82 to 35.49) per 100,000 humans. The suspected rabies deaths in humans were also estimated to be 4.57 (95% CI: 2.93 to 6.21) per one million humans annually. In both cases, considerable heterogeneities were presented across the included studies, and obvious publication biases were detected using Egger's regression test. Among animals, the highest combined estimate per 100,000 population was recorded in dogs, 120.99 (95% CI: 46.29 to 195.69), followed by equines and cattle, with pooled incidence rates of 19.57 (95% CI: -1.85 to 40.98) and 18.08 (95% CI: 1 to 35.15), respectively. It was also described that human exposure to rabid animals and human rabies deaths were more common among children.

Conclusions: The current study showed a high pooled incidence rate of human exposure to rabid animals. Significant overall incidence rates of rabies in humans and animals were also indicated. Therefore, strengthening intersectoral and transdisciplinary collaborations through one health approach are key components for rabies prevention and control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA 2020 Flow diagram for literature search and selection.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Forest plot for the incidence rates of human exposure to suspected rabid animals [7,16,19,24,27].
Fig 3
Fig 3. Forest plot for subgroup analysis of incidences of human exposure by regions [7,16,19,24,27].
Fig 4
Fig 4. Forest plot of sensitivity analysis for incidence rates of human exposure to rabid animals [7,16,19,24,27].
Fig 5
Fig 5. Forest plot for the incidence rates of suspected human rabies [7,17,19,22,25,27].
Fig 6
Fig 6. Forest plot for sensitivity analysis of incidence rate of suspected human rabies [7,17,19,22,25,27].

Similar articles

References

    1. WHO expert consultation on rabies: second report. World Health Organization; 2013. - PubMed
    1. WHO. Rabies fact sheets. 2023. September 20. [cited 2023 Oct 05] Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/rabies.
    1. Fekadu M, Endeshaw T, Alemu W, Bogale Y, Teshager T, Olson JG. Possible human-to-human transmission of rabies in Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J. 1996;34(2):123–7. - PubMed
    1. Hampson K, Coudeville L, Lembo T, Sambo M, Kieffer A, Attlan M, et al.. Estimating the global burden of endemic canine rabies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(4):e0003709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003709 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yimer E, Newayeselassie B, Teferra G, Mekonnen Y, Bogale Y, Zewde B, et al.. Situation of rabies in Ethiopia: a retrospective study 1990–2000. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2002;16(1). doi: 10.4314/ejhd.v16i1.9832 - DOI