Profit shifting from Nigeria to Europe: The impact on human rights
- PMID: 40106767
- PMCID: PMC11957553
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004218
Profit shifting from Nigeria to Europe: The impact on human rights
Abstract
The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that everyone is entitled to economic and social rights essential to survive and thrive (Articles 25 and 26) and everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which their rights and freedom can be realised (Article 28). These rights must be ensured through national efforts and international cooperation (Article 22), but many millions of people worldwide do not access their rights, including the right to clean drinking water, safe sanitation, healthcare, and education. Government revenue from taxes plays a crucial role in ensuring these rights. However, globally, 10% of corporate tax revenue is lost because multinational corporations shift their profits from where they operate. This study examines the impact of profit shifting on tax revenue in Nigeria, focussing on access to economic and social rights and governance. It estimates the impact of revenue gains made on profits shifted from Nigeria to European tax havens, using data on profits shifted published by Wier and Zucman in 2022 and the Government Revenue and Development Estimations (GRADE) model for the estimations. The findings reveal that if the Nigerian government had additional revenue equivalent to tax losses, an additional 500,000 Nigerians would have their right to drink clean water and nearly 800,000 their right to use basic sanitation each day, 150,000 children would have their right to education, and 11 children would have their right to survive each day (amounting to 4,063 children each year). Increased revenue would also improve governance. In contrast, the gains European tax havens make as destinations for shifted profits in terms of rights are almost negligible, given that almost all Europeans have those economic and social rights discussed in this paper fulfilled. The tax reforms championed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), including 27 European member nations, to tackle aggressive corporate tax avoidance and tax evasion-in short, tax abuse-fall short of ensuring a suitable international order for rights to be achieved. To remedy this, all European countries must support negotiations on international tax cooperation at the United Nations. This should include reforms on regulating multinational corporations, particularly through unitary taxation with formulary apportionment. In the short- and medium-term, interim measures to mitigate the harmful impacts of profit shifting are necessary. Countries must take steps to raise the global minimum corporate tax rate, introduce unilateral measures to tax multinational corporations, improve tax transparency and information sharing with lower-income countries, and strengthen anti-avoidance rules.
Copyright: © 2025 Etter-Phoya et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Financing child rights in Malawi.BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):2255. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16319-x. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37974100 Free PMC article.
-
How can corporate taxes contribute to sub-Saharan Africa's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)? A case study of Vodafone.Global Health. 2023 Mar 20;19(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00894-6. Global Health. 2023. PMID: 36935478 Free PMC article.
-
International corporate tax avoidance and domestic government health expenditure.Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Nov 1;97(11):746-753. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.220897. Epub 2019 Sep 3. Bull World Health Organ. 2019. PMID: 31673190 Free PMC article.
-
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023. Ann Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 36969097 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Economic Impact of Smoking and of Reducing Smoking Prevalence: Review of Evidence.Tob Use Insights. 2015 Jul 14;8:1-35. doi: 10.4137/TUI.S15628. eCollection 2015. Tob Use Insights. 2015. PMID: 26242225 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). 1948:496–501.
-
- UN. Charter of the United Nations. ‘1 UNTS XVI.’ [Internet]. 1945. Available from: UN General Assembly. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Dec 16, 1966 p. 3.
-
- UN General Assembly. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights [Internet]. Dec 16, 1966 p. 3. Available from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b36c0.html
-
- UN General Assembly. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Available from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3aa0.html; 1966:p. 171.
-
- Anderson J, Murdie A. What helps protect human rights: Human rights theory and evidence. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics; 2017. [cited 2024 Jul 17]. Available from: https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001... - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources