Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Jul;169(1):85-93.e3.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2025.02.031. Epub 2025 Mar 17.

Capsule Endoscopy-Guided Proactive Treat-to-Target Versus Continued Standard Care in Patients With Quiescent Crohn's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Capsule Endoscopy-Guided Proactive Treat-to-Target Versus Continued Standard Care in Patients With Quiescent Crohn's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Shomron Ben-Horin et al. Gastroenterology. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Background & aims: Optimal treat-to-target strategies for Crohn's disease (CD) are still being sought. The value of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) to guide proactive treat-to-target optimization in CD was examined.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial of patients with small bowel-involved (L1/L3) CD in corticosteroid-free clinical remission (Crohn's Disease Activity Index < 150). Patients ingested a VCE at baseline and those with a Lewis inflammatory score (LS) ≥ 350 were designated "high risk" and randomized to either treat-to-target treatment optimization or continued standard care. Treat-to-target was optimized by means of repeat VCE results every 6 months. Patients with LS < 350 ("low risk") continued standard care. The primary outcome was the rate of disease exacerbation (Crohn's Disease Activity Index increase > 70 points and score > 150 or hospitalization/surgery) in high-risk standard care vs treat-to-target groups at 24 months.

Results: Of 118 patients screened, 60 were enrolled. Treatment intensification in patients in the high-risk group allocated to proactive strategy comprised biologic dose escalation (n = 11 of 20), starting a biologic (n = 8 of 20), or swapping biologics (n = 1 of 20). The primary outcome, clinical flare by 24 months, occurred in 5 of 20 (25%) of high-risk treat-to-target patients vs 14 of 20 (70%) of the high-risk standard-care group (odds ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.57; P = .006). Mucosal healing was significantly more common among the treat-to-target group when determined by a cutoff LS < 350 (odds ratio, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.7-17.4; nominal P value = .03), but not by the combined scores of total LS < 450 and highest-segment LS < 350. Among all patients continuing standard care (n = 40), baseline LS was numerically higher among relapsers vs nonrelapsers (450, 225-900 vs 225, 135-600, respectively; P = .07). Of 221 VCEs ingested, there was a single (0.4%) temporarily retained spontaneously resolved event.

Conclusions: A VCE-guided treat-to-target strategy for patients with CD in remission confers superior clinical outcomes compared with continued standard care.

Clinicaltrials: gov, Number: NCT03555058.

Keywords: Capsule Endoscopy; Crohn's Disease; Inflammatory Bowel Disease; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances

Associated data