Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 18;15(3):e093853.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093853.

Liberation from mechanical ventilation using Extubation Advisor Decision Support (LEADS): protocol for a multicentre pilot trial

Affiliations

Liberation from mechanical ventilation using Extubation Advisor Decision Support (LEADS): protocol for a multicentre pilot trial

Karen E A Burns et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Timely successful liberation from invasive ventilation has the potential to minimise critically ill patients' exposure to invasive ventilation, save costs and improve outcomes; yet no trials have evaluated strategies to better inform extubation decision-making. The Liberation from mechanical ventilation using Extubation Advisor (EA) Decision Support (LEADS) Pilot Trial will assess the feasibility of a trial of a novel extubation decision support tool on feasibility metrics. The primary feasibility outcome will reflect our ability to recruit the desired population. Secondary feasibility outcomes will assess rates of (1) consent, (2) randomisation, (3) intervention adherence, (4) bidirectional crossovers and the (5) completeness of clinical outcomes collected. We will also evaluate physicians' perceptions of the usefulness of the EA tool and measure costs related to EA implementation.

Methods and analysis: We will include critically ill adults who are invasively ventilated for ≥48 hours and who are ready to undergo a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) with a view to extubation. Patients in the intervention arm will undergo an EA assessment that measures respiratory rate variability to derive an estimate of extubation readiness. Treating clinicians (respiratory therapists, attending physicians and intensive care unit fellows) will receive an EA report for each SBT conducted. The EA report will assist, rather than direct, extubation decision-making. Patients in the control arm will receive standard care. SBTs will be directed by clinicians, using current best evidence, without EA assessments or reports. We aim to recruit 1 to 2 patients/month in approximately 10 centres, and to achieve >75% consent rate, >95% randomisation among consented patients, >80% of EA reports generated and delivered (intervention arm), <10% crossovers (both arms) and >90% of patients with complete clinical outcomes. We will also report physician point-of-care perceptions of the usefulness of the EA tool.

Ethics and dissemination: The LEADS Pilot Trial is approved by the Research Ethics Boards of all participating centres and Clinical Trials Ontario (4008). We will disseminate the LEADS trial findings through conference presentations and publication.

Trial registration number: NCT05506904.

Protocol version: 24 April 2024.

Keywords: Adult intensive & critical care; Artificial Intelligence; Machine Learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: ‘Yes, there are competing interests for one or more authors and I have provided a Competing Interests statement in my manuscript and in the box below’

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Risk for extubation failure based on predictive model quartile. PPV, positive predictive value; ROC AUC, receiver operator curve area under the curve; RRV, respiratory rate variability; RSBI, rapid shallow breathing index.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Flow through the LEADS trial. CRF, case report form; EA, extubation advisor; GCS; Glasgow Coma Scale; MD; physician; RT; respiratory therapist; SBT; spontaneous breathing trial; SDM; substitute decision maker.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adhikari NKJ, Fowler RA, Bhagwanjee S, et al. Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults. Lancet. 2010;376:1339–46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60446-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dasta JF, McLaughlin TP, Mody SH, et al. Daily cost of an intensive care unit day: the contribution of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:1266–71. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000164543.14619.00. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coplin WM, Pierson DJ, Cooley KD, et al. Implications of extubation delay in brain-injured patients meeting standard weaning criteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:1530–6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9905102. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lone NI, Walsh TS. Prolonged mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: epidemiology, outcomes and modelling the potential cost consequences of establishing a regional weaning unit. Crit Care. 2011;15 doi: 10.1186/cc10117. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burns KEA, Jacob SK, Aguirre V, et al. Stakeholder Engagement in Trial Design: Survey of Visitors to Critically Ill Patients Regarding Preferences for Outcomes and Treatment Options during Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13:1962–8. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201606-445OC. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data