Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 Mar 19;25(1):217.
doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05548-1.

STORCH Brazil: multicenter cohort study protocol to investigate neurodevelopmental paths and functioning in infants exposed to STORCH in Brazil

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

STORCH Brazil: multicenter cohort study protocol to investigate neurodevelopmental paths and functioning in infants exposed to STORCH in Brazil

Daniele Almeida Soares-Marangoni et al. BMC Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: The acronym STORCH encompasses gestational infections that can lead to congenital syndromes or adverse neurological outcomes in children. In Brazil and worldwide, there has been an alarming increase in confirmed cases of STORCH in recent years. However, no study has examined the impact of STORCH on infants' neurodevelopmental outcomes in a large, multi-center cohort, recruiting a substantial number of participants, with analysis across a broad set of variables and ages and based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model.

Objective: To examine the association between the exposure to classic STORCH (syphilis, toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus infection, and herpes simplex) on components of functioning in infants from 3 to 24 months old in Brazil.

Methods: We propose a multi-center prospective cohort study that includes data collection in at least one city from each geographical region of Brazil. A proposed total sample size of 296 infants will be included at 3 months (12-15 weeks post term). They will be equitably divided into: (a) an exposed group (n = 148), consisting of those diagnosed with any congenital STORCH infection or whose mothers experienced prenatal STORCH infection; (b) an unexposed group (n = 148). Assessments are carried out longitudinally at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months of age. Assessment tools include Prechtl's General Movements Assessment, Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination, Alberta Infant Motor Scale; Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development; Survey of Well-being of Young Children; Autism Observational Scale for Infants; Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers; Child Behavior Checklist; and Young Children's Participation and Environment Measure. Descriptive analyses, including the calculation of relative risk, and logistic regressions will be conducted to examine the association between gestational exposure to STORCH agents and infants' responses/outcomes.

Discussion: The STORCH Brazil study will investigate the impact of STORCH exposure on functioning, including neurodevelopmental trajectories, in infants during their first two years, aligning with the ICF framework. This will enhance understanding of the characteristics and needs of STORCH-exposed infants, aiding therapists in making informed clinical decisions. The results might support public policies tailored to this population. Findings will be disseminated to ensure knowledge translation.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Keywords: Autism spectrum disorders; Cerebral palsy; Congenital infection; Infant development; Infant follow-up; Prenatal care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethical approval was obtained before the start of the project by the Ethical Committee on Human Research of the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (CAAE: 81691424.8.0000.0320). A written, informed legal consent form is signed by the parents before the infant is included in the study. Consent for publication: Not applied at this moment. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustrated study design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Assessment tools considering the components of the ICF model
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Timeline, in months, of the assessment tools used in each age

References

    1. Nahmias AJ, The TORCH, Complex. Hosp Pract. 1974;9(5):65–72. 10.1080/21548331.1974.11708004.
    1. Fuerst HT. Flame or bird? Pediatrics. 1975;56(1):107. 10.1542/peds.56.1.107.
    1. Mussi-Pinhata MM, Yamamoto AY. Infecções congênitas e perinatais. J Pediatr (Rio J). 1999;75:S15–30. - PubMed
    1. Leung KY, Hon KL, Yeung A, Leung AK, Man E. Congenital infections in Hong Kong: an overview of TORCH. Hong Kong Med J. 2020;26(2):127–38. 10.12809/hkmj198287. - PubMed
    1. Tahotná A, Brucknerová J, Brucknerová I. Zika virus infection from a newborn point of view. TORCH or TORZiCH? Interdiscip Toxicol. 2018;11(4):241–6. 10.2478/intox-2018-0023. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types