Questioning the classification of "high blood flow" versus "low blood flow" ECCO₂R in ultra-low tidal volume ventilation studies: a call for functional classification
- PMID: 40108676
- PMCID: PMC11921688
- DOI: 10.1186/s13054-025-05352-4
Questioning the classification of "high blood flow" versus "low blood flow" ECCO₂R in ultra-low tidal volume ventilation studies: a call for functional classification
Keywords: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; ECCO2R; Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal; Intensive care; Ventilator-induced lung injury.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publications: Not applicable. Competing interests: MW&QY declare to have competing interests. MZ declare to have no competing interests. This article is not supported by any company or funding.
Comment on
-
Feasibility and safety of ultra-low volume ventilation (≤ 3 ml/kg) combined with extra corporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) in acute respiratory failure patients.Crit Care. 2024 Dec 27;28(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05168-8. Crit Care. 2024. PMID: 39731126 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Combes A, Tonetti T, Fanelli V, et al. Efficacy and safety of lower versus higher CO2 extraction devices to allow ultraprotective ventilation: secondary analysis of the SUPERNOVA study. Thorax. 2019;74(12):1179–81. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-213591. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous