Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 19;12(3):241380.
doi: 10.1098/rsos.241380. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Developing the evidence-base to inform policy on inclusive research design

Affiliations

Developing the evidence-base to inform policy on inclusive research design

Stella A Child et al. R Soc Open Sci. .

Abstract

Considering diversity when designing and conducting research is fundamental to the responsible conduct of research and ensures that outputs from scientific research are reproducible, minimize bias and enable everyone within society the opportunity to benefit. Therefore, health and biomedical research should include consideration of diversity and inclusion in the way studies are designed and conducted. An evaluation of health researchers' approaches to diversity was undertaken to generate evidence to inform research policy development by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC). Seven hundred and seventy-two researchers responded to an anonymized public survey about diversity and inclusion in research design and 590 applications for research funding were evaluated. Fifty per cent of survey respondents undertaking human participant research reported taking diversity, usually age and sex, into account. Although 43% of animal researchers reported using females and males, only 28% of grant applications demonstrated this. Our findings demonstrate that many researchers do not routinely consider diversity when designing research. Furthermore, we identified a gap between what animal researchers reported doing and what was evident in funding applications. Informed by this analysis, MRC implemented a new policy requiring researchers to demonstrate how they embed diversity and inclusion in research design. This survey provides a benchmark for evaluating policy impact.

Keywords: diversity; inclusion; research policy; responsible conduct of research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors, except for Leah Li, were employees of the Medical Research Council (MRC) when the research was undertaken. The authors have no other competing interests to declare.

Figures

Survey responses and exclusions.
Figure 1.
Survey responses and exclusions

Similar articles

References

    1. US Government Accountability Office (GAO) . 2024. Drug safety: most drugs withdrawn in recent years had greater health risks for women. Report GAO-01-286R. See https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-01-286r.
    1. Stanford University . 2024. Gendered innovations. See https://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/ (accessed 2 March 2024).
    1. Linder A, Svedberg W. 2019. Review of average sized male and female occupant models in European regulatory safety assessment tests and European laws: gaps and bridging suggestions. Accid. Anal. Prev. 127, 156–162. (10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.030) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buolamwini J, Gebru T. 2018. Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proc. Mach. Learn. Res 81, 77–91. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a
    1. Morris H, Denver N, Gaw R, Labazi H, Mair K, MacLean MR. 2021. Sex differences in pulmonary hypertension. Clin. Chest Med. 42, 217–228. (10.1016/j.ccm.2020.10.005) - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources