Robotic reconstruction for benign upper urinary tract obstruction: a review of the current literature

Abstract

The field of reconstructive urology has seen a paradigm shift in the surgical approach for intra-abdominal cases, resulting in an increased preference for minimally invasive techniques. The introduction of the surgical robot has led to exponential growth in innovative approaches, reflecting the ongoing efforts to improve patient outcomes and address the limitations of open and laparoscopic surgery. This review article summarizes the knowledge gained in the last 10 years about adult robotic ureteral reconstruction. A non-systematic literature review was conducted on February 18, 2024 using Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase libraries. Studies published in English since 2014 reporting at least five robotic ureteral reconstructive cases for the management of benign ureteral obstruction in adults were included. A narrative review focusing on robotic ureteral reconstructive techniques, their associated success and complication rates, and how the robotic approach compares to open and laparoscopic reconstruction was performed. The current literature demonstrates increased utilization of the robotic platform in reconstructive urological procedures. Robotic surgery has been shown to be associated with shorter learning curves, lower surgeon fatigue, better visualization and equivalent results to those seen with laparoscopic surgery. While the literature is limited by a lack of comparative data, well-designed randomized controlled trials, and standardized criteria for defining and measuring success, this review demonstrates the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of robotic ureteral reconstruction for managing benign ureteral strictures, confirming it as a viable alternative to open and laparoscopic surgery.

Keywords: robotics; ureteral obstruction; ureteral reconstruction; ureteral stricture.

Figure 1.

Anatomic rendition of the kidney, ureter, and bladder with depiction of reconstructive techniques by stricture location and length: findings from a narrative review.

Figure 2.

Study selection flow chart.