External fixators and lengthening systems in pediatric upper limb
- PMID: 40110071
- PMCID: PMC11915237
- DOI: 10.1177/18632521251327127
External fixators and lengthening systems in pediatric upper limb
Abstract
The use of external fixators is part of the cultural background of orthopedic surgeons in treating numerous clinical conditions. Over the years, fixator design and biomechanical knowledge have led to different solutions and techniques, and bone lengthening and its better understanding come together with the development of external fixators and the application of the biological principle of distraction osteogenesis. The authors conducted a literature review about using external fixators and lengthening systems in pediatric upper limbs. Despite the applications of external fixators in upper limbs remaining much more limited than those of the lower limbs, there are indications of traumatic, congenital, tumor, and infectious etiologies. However, despite the spread of new systems of plate and screws and intramedullary lengthening nails, the problems about when to use external fixation remain unsolved. Another debated point is about using monolateral or circular frames for humeral lengthening and the correction of forearm deformities in multiple hereditary exostoses disease (MHE) or radial longitudinal deficiency sequelae. Monoaxial fixators retain a prominent role for skeletal lengthening in all the districts examined, although their role could be outclassed by the motorized intramedullary nails, especially for humeral lengthening. Hexapod systems are likely to represent the future for the correction of multiplanar forearm deformities; however, multicenter studies on larger series will be necessary to better validate their applications and advantages.
Keywords: External fixator; pediatric deformities; upper limb.
© The Author(s) 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures





Similar articles
-
What Are the Risks and Functional Outcomes Associated With Bilateral Humeral Lengthening Using a Monolateral External Fixator in Patients With Achondroplasia?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Sep 1;480(9):1779-1789. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002209. Epub 2022 Apr 25. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022. PMID: 35471200 Free PMC article.
-
Acute Correction of Multiplanar Proximal Tibial Deformity Utilizing Fixator-Assisted Intramedullary Nailing.JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2022 Aug 31;12(3):e21.00045. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00045. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2022. PMID: 36816522 Free PMC article.
-
[External fixation for the correction of complex deformities : From the classic Ilizarov ring fixator to modern software-driven hexapod fixators].Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2023 Sep;52(9):710-718. doi: 10.1007/s00132-023-04419-w. Epub 2023 Jul 31. Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2023. PMID: 37522930 Review. German.
-
[Humeral lengthening with a monolateral external fixator in achondroplasia].Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2007;13(3):121-4. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2007. PMID: 17880818 Polish.
-
Role of hybrid monolateral fixators in managing humeral length and deformity correction.Acta Orthop. 2013 Jun;84(3):280-5. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.786636. Epub 2013 Mar 19. Acta Orthop. 2013. PMID: 23506166 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Hernigou P. History of external fixation for treatment of fractures. Int Orthop 2017; 41(4): 845–853. - PubMed
-
- Farr S, Mindler G, Ganger R, et al.. Bone lengthening in the Pediatric Upper Extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98(17): 1490–1503. - PubMed
-
- Calder PR, Faimali M, Goodier WD. The role of external fixation in pediatric upper limb lengthening and deformity correction. Injury 2019; 50 Suppl 1: S18–S23. - PubMed
-
- Fassett F. An inquiry as to the practicability of equalizing unequal legs by operation. Am J Orthop Surg 1918; 16: 277.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources