Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb;29(2):164-169.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24911. Epub 2025 Jan 31.

Comparison of Braden Score vs APACHE to Predict Occurrence of Bed Sores in a Tertiary Care ICU

Khuram Maqbool  1 , Munish Chauhan  1 , Sandeep Dewan  1
Affiliations

Comparison of Braden Score vs APACHE to Predict Occurrence of Bed Sores in a Tertiary Care ICU

Khuram Maqbool et al. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Pressure sores, or bedsores, pose a challenge in intensive care unit (ICU) care due to patients' immobility and compromised circulation. This study explores the effectiveness of the Braden Scale and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) in predicting pressure sore occurrences.

Materials and methods: Conducted over a year in an Indian ICU, this observational study assessed the predictive capability of both scores. Participants (≥18 years) underwent Braden and APACHE II assessments upon admission, with daily monitoring for pressure sore development. Statistical analysis compared scores and ulcer occurrences.

Results: Older patients, particularly males, showed a higher tendency for ICU admission. 20.3% had pressure ulcers, significantly correlating with lower Braden and higher APACHE II scores. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II showed superior efficiency in predicting ulcers.

Discussion: While Braden scores' variability was less in ICU patients, APACHE II scores reflected acute illness severity, strongly correlating with ulcer incidence. The study advocates for a combined utilization of both scores for tailored interventions.

Conclusion: Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II demonstrated better efficiency in predicting pressure ulcers, while the Braden score remains valuable for focused assessments. The study highlights the importance of considering age, gender, acute health status, and localized risk factors in ICU pressure ulcer assessment.

Future directions: Further research might explore integrated scoring systems or protocols combining the strengths of both scores for more precise risk assessment in ICU settings.

How to cite this article: Maqbool K, Chauhan M, Dewan S. Comparison of Braden Score vs APACHE to Predict Occurrence of Bed Sores in a Tertiary Care ICU. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(2):164-169.

Keywords: Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II; Braden score; Pressure sores.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: NoneConflict of interest: None

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of efficacy of Braden score APACHE II score in detecting pressure ulcer
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Shi C, Dumville JC, Cullum N, Rhodes S, McInnes E, Goh EL, et al. Beds, overlays and mattresses for preventing and treating pressure ulcers: An overview of Cochrane Reviews and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;(8):CD013761. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013768.pub2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jaul E, Barron J, Rosenzweig JP, Menczel J. An overview of co-morbidities and the development of pressure ulcers among older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0815-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vasconez LO, Schneider WJ, Jurkiewicz MJ. Pressure sores. Curr Probl Surg. 1977;14(4):1–62. doi: 10.1016/s0011-3840(77)80007-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shea JD. Pressure sores classification and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;112:89–100. - PubMed
    1. Bergstrom N. The Braden scale for predicting pressure sore risk. Nurs Res. 1987;36(4):205–210. doi: 10.1097/00006199-198707000-00002. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources