Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 May 1;151(5):485-494.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0056.

Hearing Loss and Falls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Hearing Loss and Falls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Brian Sheng Yep Yeo et al. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: Falls constitute a significant public health concern worldwide and have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality across all ages. Identifying potentially modifiable risk factors for falls is a key public health priority. Literature surrounding the association between hearing loss (HL) and falls remains inconclusive.

Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to comprehensively synthesize evidence surrounding the impact of HL on falls.

Data sources: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from database inception through April 9, 2024.

Study selection: Observational studies investigating the association between HL and falls were selected. Only studies reporting covariate-adjusted estimates were included to minimize confounding.

Data extraction and synthesis: Two independent reviewers evaluated studies for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Using a random-effects model, adjusted estimates were pooled in meta-analyses. Heterogeneity was evaluated using subgroup and sensitivity analyses, and publication bias was assessed.

Main outcomes and measures: The cross-sectional odds and longitudinal risk of falls among patients with HL compared with those without HL.

Results: A total of 5 071 935 participants were included from 27 studies; approximately 49.2% of participants were female, and 14 studies were conducted in Asia, 7 in North America, 3 in Europe, and 3 in Oceania, represented by Australia. Patients with HL exhibited an increased cross-sectional odds of falls (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.37-1.67; I2 = 64%) and longitudinal risk of falls (risk ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.29; I2 = 69%) than those without HL. Further stratification by self-reported or validated hearing assessments, fall reporting duration, continent, community-dwelling adults, and studies adjusting for other sensory deficits identified as fall risk factors by the World Falls Guideline did not change significance. These results remained robust to sensitivity analyses, and publication bias was absent.

Conclusions and relevance: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that overall, HL may be a risk factor for falls. With a rapidly aging global population, it is crucial to acknowledge the public health concerns surrounding falls and consider if HL could be a potentially modifiable risk factor. Nonetheless, further randomized clinical trials are needed to elucidate any benefit of treating HL on fall prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. PRISMA Flowchart
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Forest Plot of the Longitudinal Association of Hearing Loss and Incident Falls Compared With Individuals Without Hearing Loss
RR indicates risk ratio.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Forest Plot of the Cross-Sectional Association of Hearing Loss and Falls Compared With Individuals Without Hearing Loss, Stratified by Self-Reported vs Validated Methods of Hearing Testing
OR indicates odds ratio.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Forest Plot of the Cross-Sectional Association of Hearing Loss and Falls Compared With Individuals Without Hearing Loss Among Studies That Exclusively Corrected for Other Sensory Risk Factors for Falls
OR indicates odds ratio.

References

    1. James SL, Lucchesi LR, Bisignano C, et al. . The global burden of falls: global, regional and national estimates of morbidity and mortality from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Inj Prev. 2020;26(suppl 1):i3-i11. doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043286 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators . Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789-1858. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. GBD 2019 Ageing Collaborators . Global, regional, and national burden of diseases and injuries for adults 70 years and older: systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease 2019 Study. BMJ. 2022;376:e068208. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . Step safely: strategies for preventing and managing falls across the life-course. Accessed September 15, 2024. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/340962/9789240021914-eng.pdf
    1. Deandrea S, Lucenteforte E, Bravi F, Foschi R, La Vecchia C, Negri E. Risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology. 2010;21(5):658-668. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e89905 - DOI - PubMed