Management of severe acute encephalopathy in the ICU: an expert consensus statement from the french society of intensive care medicine
- PMID: 40113665
- PMCID: PMC11926322
- DOI: 10.1186/s13613-025-01436-0
Management of severe acute encephalopathy in the ICU: an expert consensus statement from the french society of intensive care medicine
Abstract
Introduction: Acute encephalopathy in the ICU poses significant diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic challenges. Standardized expert guidelines on acute encephalopathy are needed to improve diagnostic methods, therapeutic decisions, and prognostication.
Methods: The experts conducted a review of the literature, analysed it according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology and made proposals for guidelines, which were rated by other experts. Only expert opinions with strong agreement were selected.
Results: The synthesis of expert work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 39 recommendations. Among the 39 formalized recommendations, 1 had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1 +) and 10 had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2 + or 2-). These recommendations describe indication for ICU admission, use of clinical scores and EEG for diagnosis, detection of complications, and prognostication. The remaining 28 recommendations were based on expert consensus. These recomandations describe common indications for blood and CSF studies, neuroimaging, use of neuromonitoring, and provide guidelines for management in the acute phase.
Conclusion: This expert consensus statement aims to provide a structured framework to enhance the consistency and quality of care for ICU patients presenting with acute encephalopathy. By integrating high-quality evidence with expert opinion, it offers a pragmatic approach to addressing the complex nature of acute encephalopathy in the ICU, promoting best practices in patient care and facilitating future research in the field.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: RS received grants from the French Ministry of Health and research funding from LFB. Other authors have no COI to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Slooter AJC, Otte WM, Devlin JW, Arora RC, Bleck TP, Claassen J, Duprey MS, Ely EW, Kaplan PW, Latronico N, Morandi A, Neufeld KJ, Sharshar T, MacLullich AMJ, Stevens RD. Updated nomenclature of delirium and acute encephalopathy: statement of ten societies. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:1020–2. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2:81–4. - PubMed
-
- Wijdicks EFM, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, Manno EM, McClelland RL. Validation of a new coma scale: the FOUR score. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:585–93. - PubMed
-
- Meyfroidt G, Bouzat P, Casaer MP, Chesnut R, Hamada SR, Helbok R, Hutchinson P, Maas AIR, Manley G, Menon DK, Newcombe VFJ, Oddo M, Robba C, Shutter L, Smith M, Steyerberg EW, Stocchetti N, Taccone FS, Wilson L, Zanier ER, Citerio G. Management of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: an update for the intensivist. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48:649–66. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
