Which carbon footprint for my ICU? Benchmark, hot spots and perspectives
- PMID: 40113716
- PMCID: PMC11925816
- DOI: 10.1186/s13613-025-01445-z
Which carbon footprint for my ICU? Benchmark, hot spots and perspectives
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to identify the main greenhouse gas (GHG) emitting activities or products among the medical devices (MD) and medicines used in a polyvalent Intensive Care Unit (ICU).
Methods: A pragmatic eco-audit was conducted in a 21-beds polyvalent ICU, in Saint-Brieuc, Bretagne, France. It consisted of estimating GHG emissions of products or activities, considering process-based life cycle analysis (LCA), economic input-output analysis (EIO) and hybrid-LCA. Results were expressed as Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (CO2e) emissions per patient-day considering each medication and MD (including personal protective equipment).
Results: With remaining uncertainty, GHG emissions were estimated at 61.1 kgCO2e per patient-day. Two hundred and two individual MD were used per patient-day, equivalent to 5.1 kgCO2e per patient-day (process-based LCA). Gloves accounted for the main part of kgCO2e emissions (representing 1.8 kgCO2e per patient-day). Then, syringes (1.1 kgCO2e per patient-day), perfusion tubings (1.0 per patient-day) and gauze pads (0.4 kgCO2e per patient-day) were the most important sources of MD related GHG emissions. Forty-seven individual medicines were used per patient-day. Most consumed medications were sterile water for injection, propofol, and sodium chlorure. The GHG emissions of medications were estimated with EIO-LCA at 21.5 kgCO2e per patient-day, mostly due to injectable medicines (15.3 kgCO2e per patient-day).
Conclusion: Upcoming studies focusing on actions on these particular hot spots would be of interest in order to significantly decrease GHG emissions but also to increase resilience of critical care.
Keywords: Critical care; Global warming; Life cycle assessment.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not concern. Consent for publication: Not concerned. Competing interests: The authors have no competing interests.
Figures



References
-
- The shift project. Décarboner la santé pour soigner durablement. 2023. https://theshiftproject.org/decarboner-sante-rapport-2023/ Accessed 22 Aug 2024.
-
- Gaetani M, Uleryk E, Halgren C, Maratta C. The carbon footprint of critical care: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2024;50(5):731–45. 10.1007/s00134-023-07307-1. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials