Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 20;15(1):35.
doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01445-z.

Which carbon footprint for my ICU? Benchmark, hot spots and perspectives

Affiliations

Which carbon footprint for my ICU? Benchmark, hot spots and perspectives

Pierre Bardoult et al. Ann Intensive Care. .

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to identify the main greenhouse gas (GHG) emitting activities or products among the medical devices (MD) and medicines used in a polyvalent Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

Methods: A pragmatic eco-audit was conducted in a 21-beds polyvalent ICU, in Saint-Brieuc, Bretagne, France. It consisted of estimating GHG emissions of products or activities, considering process-based life cycle analysis (LCA), economic input-output analysis (EIO) and hybrid-LCA. Results were expressed as Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (CO2e) emissions per patient-day considering each medication and MD (including personal protective equipment).

Results: With remaining uncertainty, GHG emissions were estimated at 61.1 kgCO2e per patient-day. Two hundred and two individual MD were used per patient-day, equivalent to 5.1 kgCO2e per patient-day (process-based LCA). Gloves accounted for the main part of kgCO2e emissions (representing 1.8 kgCO2e per patient-day). Then, syringes (1.1 kgCO2e per patient-day), perfusion tubings (1.0 per patient-day) and gauze pads (0.4 kgCO2e per patient-day) were the most important sources of MD related GHG emissions. Forty-seven individual medicines were used per patient-day. Most consumed medications were sterile water for injection, propofol, and sodium chlorure. The GHG emissions of medications were estimated with EIO-LCA at 21.5 kgCO2e per patient-day, mostly due to injectable medicines (15.3 kgCO2e per patient-day).

Conclusion: Upcoming studies focusing on actions on these particular hot spots would be of interest in order to significantly decrease GHG emissions but also to increase resilience of critical care.

Keywords: Critical care; Global warming; Life cycle assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not concern. Consent for publication: Not concerned. Competing interests: The authors have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
GHG emissions distribution by category (process based LCA for medical devices, EIO-analysis for medicine and hybrid LCA for other categories)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Consumption of the most used medications. Datas are expressed as units per patient-day. *”IV solutions” includes Water for injection (IV) (10–20 mL), Glucose 5% (IV) (10–1000 mL), and Sodium Chlorure 0,9% (IV) (10–1000 mL)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Consumption and GHG emissions of the most used medical devices. Datas are expressed as units per patient-day for consumption, and as kgCO2e per patient-day for GHG emissions

References

    1. Van Daalen KR, Tonne C, Semenza JC, et al. The 2024 Europe report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: unprecedented warming demands unprecedented action. Lancet Public Health. 2024;9(7):e495–522. 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00055-0. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The shift project. Décarboner la santé pour soigner durablement. 2023. https://theshiftproject.org/decarboner-sante-rapport-2023/ Accessed 22 Aug 2024.
    1. Koch S, Klitzman R. Reliance on fossil fuels: ethical implications for intensivists. Intensive Care Med. 2023;49(3):330–3. 10.1007/s00134-023-06994-0. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gaetani M, Uleryk E, Halgren C, Maratta C. The carbon footprint of critical care: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2024;50(5):731–45. 10.1007/s00134-023-07307-1. - PubMed
    1. McGain F, Burnham JP, Lau R, Aye L, Kollef MH, McAlister S. The carbon footprint of treating patients with septic shock in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Resusc. 2018;20(4):304–12. 10.1016/S1441-2772(23)00970-5. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources