Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb;14(2):609-616.
doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_142_24. Epub 2025 Feb 21.

Qualitative study to explore reasons for 'no-show' after diagnosis of breast cancer in a private teaching hospital in Kerala

Affiliations

Qualitative study to explore reasons for 'no-show' after diagnosis of breast cancer in a private teaching hospital in Kerala

Rehna Chaneparambil Mohamed et al. J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Breast Cancer is the commonest cancer among women both in developed and developing world. Exploring the reasons involved in 'no-show' at the health facility, which is also a teaching hospital, after being diagnosed with breast cancer can aid as a problem identifier, act as an add-on for continuous quality improvement in healthcare and open avenue of understanding about participation that women have in decision-making. This study aims to explore the reasons for 'no-show' after diagnosis of breast cancer in a teaching hospital.

Method: A hospital-based cancer registry was used to extract the number of patients from the medical records department (MRD) who were diagnosed with breast cancer but did not show up for the treatment offered. Qualitative study method of in-depth interview was employed to understand the reasons for not following up after diagnosis. Interviews were audio taped, transcribed verbatim, analyzed for thematic contents using the standard content analysis framework.

Result: Personal, familial, social, and hospital-related factors were involved in not following up in the health facility. The major themes were financial difficulties, general inconvenience, others' decisions, alternative therapy, acclaimed oncologists, and awful occurrences, which were categorized under three heads as perceived barriers to continuing treatment in the health facility of study, perceived benefits of treatment in other facilities, and influence of family, friends, and society on decision-making.

Conclusion: The study throws light on the multitude of reasons behind 'no-show' behavior among patients with breast cancer from the facility where the diagnosis was made, highlighting the requirement for a more patient-centred approach that considers financial, social, and psychological factors in healthcare delivery. Addressing these barriers could significantly improve treatment adherence and outcomes in breast cancer care.

Keywords: Breast cancer; care approach; decision making; exploratory study; no show after diagnosis; patient behavior; qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow chart

References

    1. Breast cancer. [[Last accessed on 2022 Mar 21]]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer .
    1. Bleicher RJ. Timing and delays in breast cancer evaluation and treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:2829–38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM, Newman LA, Miller KD, Sauer AG, et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:438–51. - PubMed
    1. Northouse LL. Psychological impact of the diagnosis of breast cancer on the patient and her family. J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972) 1992;47:161–4. - PubMed
    1. Weaver SJ, Jacobsen PB. Cancer care coordination: Opportunities for healthcare delivery research. Transl Behav Med. 2018;8:503–8. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources