Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e251421.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1421.

Seven vs Fourteen Days of Antibiotics for Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infection: A Systematic Review and Noninferiority Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Seven vs Fourteen Days of Antibiotics for Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infection: A Systematic Review and Noninferiority Meta-Analysis

Todd C Lee et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Erratum in

  • Error in Affiliations and Results.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e2512343. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.12343. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 40272806 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: Gram-negative bloodstream infections are a common cause of hospitalization. A 2-week duration of antibiotic therapy has been commonly used, but shorter durations may have similar outcomes.

Objectives: To assess whether 7 days of antibiotic therapy was noninferior to 14 days.

Data sources: Starting with a 2022 individual patient data meta-analysis, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched to identify additional eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs) conducted from May 1, 2022, until November 30, 2024.

Study selection: RCTs involving primarily adults who were hospitalized at the time of Gram-negative bloodstream infection and were allocated to 7 or 14 days of antibiotic therapy. Studies were independently reviewed by 2 investigators.

Data extraction and synthesis: PRISMA guidelines were followed. Data were extracted by 2 investigators. Any unpublished data were obtained directly from study authors. Risk of bias and certainty of the evidence were assessed in duplicate using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, version 2, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Data were pooled by separate random-effects meta-analyses for the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations. A noninformative prior probability was used for the effect, and an evidence-based weakly informative prior probability was used for heterogeneity. Risk ratios (RRs), 95% credible intervals (CrIs), and probability of noninferiority were calculated using a prespecified upper bound of 1.25 or less.

Main outcomes and measures: Ninety-day all-cause mortality.

Results: Four eligible RCTs contributed 3729 patients in the ITT population (1912 women [51.3%]; median age range, 67-79 years) and 3126 in the PP population. In the ITT analysis, within 90 days, 226 patients (12.8%) receiving 7 days of antibiotics died compared with 253 (13.7%) receiving 14 days, corresponding to an RR for 90-day mortality of 0.91 (95% CrI, 0.69-1.22) and a 97.8% probability of noninferiority. In the PP analysis, the RR was 0.93 (95% CrI, 0.68-1.32), corresponding to a 95.1% probability of noninferiority.

Conclusions and relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infections and adequate source control, 7 days of antibiotic therapy had a high probability of being noninferior to 14 days. These findings support a shorter duration of antibiotic therapy for appropriately selected patients like those in the included RCTs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Lee reported receiving salary support from Fonds de Recherche du Quebec–Sante and operating funds for clinical trials from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) outside the submitted work. Dr Fralick reported receiving patient recruitment fees from the CIHR during the conduct of the Bacteremia Antibiotic Length Actually Needed for Clinical Effectiveness (BALANCE) study; personal fees from Proof Diagnostics Inc and Signal 1 outside the submitted work; serving as an expert witness on content unrelated to this work; and holding a provisional patent for a model that predicts acute dialysis needs. Dr McDonald reported a patent pending for SensifAI detection of inflammation. Dr Paul reported serving as principal investigator of an investigator-initiated study funded by Shionogi & Company Limited on the effectiveness of cefiderocol for treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Dr Rishu reported receiving grant support from the CIHR during the conduct of the BALANCE study. Dr Yahav reported participating in a collaborative retrospective study for Pfizer Inc and grant support from Shionogi & Company Limited for an investigator-initiated study outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. PRISMA Diagram
PRISMA indicates Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Forest Plot of Included Studies
The top panel shows the intention-to-treat results and the lower panel the per-protocol results. The prespecified noninferiority margin (risk ratio [RR], 1.25) is indicated by the vertical dotted line. The vertical dashed lines show the point estimate for the pooled results. Size of squares indicates the relative weight of the individual study; diamonds, the pooled RR and 95% credible interval (CrI). BALANCE indicates Bacteremia Antibiotic Length Actually Needed for Clinical Effectiveness.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Probability of Noninferiority (or Superiority) as a Function of the Upper Bound
The y-axis represents the probability of a result less than or equal to the x-axis value. For example, at the prespecified upper bound of 1.25, the probability that the risk ratio (RR) is 1.25 or less is 97.8% for the intention-to-treat analysis and 95.1% for the per-protocol analysis. The dashed line at 1.00 represents superiority (RR is ≤1.00); the dashed line at 1.25 represents noninferiority.

References

    1. Davar K, Clark D, Centor RM, et al. . Can the future of ID escape the inertial dogma of its past? the exemplars of shorter is better and oral is the new IV. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022;10(1):ofac706. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofac706 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Daneman N, Shore K, Pinto R, Fowler R. Antibiotic treatment duration for bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: a national survey of Canadian infectious diseases and critical care specialists. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;38(6):480-485. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.07.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Molina J, Montero-Mateos E, Praena-Segovia J, et al. ; SHORTEN trial team . Seven- versus 14-day course of antibiotics for the treatment of bloodstream infections by Enterobacterales: a randomized, controlled trial. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022;28(4):550-557. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yahav D, Franceschini E, Koppel F, et al. ; Bacteremia Duration Study Group . Seven versus 14 days of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated Gram-negative bacteremia: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(7):1091-1098. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy1054 - DOI - PubMed
    1. von Dach E, Albrich WC, Brunel AS, et al. . Effect of C-reactive protein–guided antibiotic treatment duration, 7-day treatment, or 14-day treatment on 30-day clinical failure rate in patients with uncomplicated Gram-negative bacteremia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;323(21):2160-2169. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.6348 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances