Cemiplimab Monotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Patients with Advanced NSCLC With PD-L1 Expression of 50% or Higher: Five-Year Outcomes of EMPOWER-Lung 1
- PMID: 40118215
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2025.03.033
Cemiplimab Monotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Patients with Advanced NSCLC With PD-L1 Expression of 50% or Higher: Five-Year Outcomes of EMPOWER-Lung 1
Abstract
Introduction: Earlier results from the phase 3 EMPOWER-Lung 1 trial indicated significant survival benefits and a generally acceptable safety profile of first-line cemiplimab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for patients with advanced NSCLC with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in 50% or more tumor cells and no EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 aberrations. Here, we report the five-year outcomes.
Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously every three weeks for two years or the investigator's choice of chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival.
Results: A total of 712 patients were randomized to cemiplimab (n = 357) or chemotherapy (n = 355). The median duration of follow-up was 59.6 months (interquartile range: 55.1-66.7 months) at the data cutoff (January 16, 2024). In patients with verified 50% or higher PD-L1 (n = 565), median OS was 26.1 months for cemiplimab versus 13.3 months for chemotherapy (hazard ratio = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.72); the median progression-free survival was 8.1 months versus 5.3 months (hazard ratio = 0.50, 95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.61); and the objective response rate was 46.5% versus 20.6%. The five-year OS probability was 29.0% for cemiplimab and 15.0% for chemotherapy. Improved survival outcomes were observed with both squamous and nonsquamous histology, and increasing activity of cemiplimab was correlated with higher PD-L1 expression, with the highest PD-L1 expression having the best outcome. The safety profile remains consistent with previous results. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 18.3% of patients for cemiplimab and 39.9% for chemotherapy.
Conclusions: At five-year follow-up, first-line cemiplimab monotherapy continued to show durable clinical benefits versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC with 50% or higher PD-L1. Patients with 90% or higher PD-L1 derived the largest clinical benefits.
Keywords: Cemiplimab; Lung neoplasms; Non–small cell lung cancer; PD-L1; Programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitor.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure Dr. Kilickap reports receiving meeting and travel support from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Özgüroğlu reports advisory board participation for Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and receiving travel and accommodation support from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Gümüş reports honoraria to institution for lectures from Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Gen İlaç, and Novartis outside the submitted work. Dr. Schenker reports research grants from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Roche, Merck Serono, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Astellas, Amgen, BeiGene, Bayer, Eisai, Pfizer, GSK, AbbVie, Bioven, Novartis, Clovis, Daichii Sankyo, PharmaMar, Tesaro, and Five Prime Therapeutics. Dr. Ho reports institutional grants from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., MSD, AB Science, Astellas, Tessa Therapeutics, Roche, Arcus Bioscience, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Janssen Research & Development, Mirati Therapeutics, Novartis, Amgen, and Boehringer Ingelheim; honoraria from MSD, Novartis, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Merck & Co., Inc., and Eisai; meeting and travel support from Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Roche, Servier, Zullig Pharma, and Pfizer; data safety monitoring or advisory board participation for MSD, Novartis, Roche, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Astellas Pharma, Inc., and Takeda Pharmaceuticals; and institutional receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from Pfizer, Novartis, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Taiho, and Eli Lilly. Dr. Garassino reports grants from Merck; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, MSD International GmbH, Bristo Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim Italia S.p.A, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ignyta, Incyte, Inivata, MedImmune, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Seattle Genetics, Mirati, Daiichi Sankyo, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck, Pfizer (MISP), Celgene, Tiziana, Foundation Medicine, GSK, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, AIRC, AIFA, the Italian Ministry of Health, and TRANSCAN; honoraria from AstraZeneca, MSD International GmbH, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim Italia S.p.A, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ignyta, Incyte, Inivata, MedImmune, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Seattle Genetics, Mirati, Daiichi Sankyo, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck, Pfizer (MISP), Tiziana, Foundation Medicine, GSK, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, AIRC, AIFA, the Italian Ministry of Health, and TRANSCAN; meeting and travel support from Merck; and data safety monitoring or advisory board participation for Eli Lilly, Pfizer (MISP), AstraZeneca, MSD International GmbH, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim Italia S.p.A, Celgene, Ignyta, Incyte, MedImmune, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Tiziana, Foundation Medicine, GSK, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, AIRC, AIFA, the Italian Ministry of Health, and TRANSCAN. Drs. Li, Zhu, Kaul, Perez, Seebach, Lowy, Pouliot, Kim, and Magnan are employees of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and own stock or stock options. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Sugemalimab versus placebo, in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, as first-line treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (GEMSTONE-302): 4-year outcomes from a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2025 Jul;26(7):887-897. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00198-6. Epub 2025 Jun 13. Lancet Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40523368 Clinical Trial.
-
Real-world PD-L1 testing, fi rst-line therapy for advanced NSCLC, and fi rst-line pembrolizumab monotherapy utilization and outcomes for metastatic NSCLC in the Czech Republic.Klin Onkol. 2025;38(3):192-200. doi: 10.48095/ccko2025192. Klin Onkol. 2025. PMID: 40762199 English.
-
Comparison of efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 combination therapy in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Oct;26(10):2488-2502. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03442-3. Epub 2024 Apr 16. Clin Transl Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38625495
-
Long-Term Survival Outcomes With First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab-Based Treatment in Patients With Metastatic NSCLC and Tumor Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Lower Than 1%: A Pooled Analysis.J Thorac Oncol. 2025 Jan;20(1):94-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2024.09.1439. Epub 2024 Oct 4. J Thorac Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39369790 Clinical Trial.
-
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapies in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.Front Immunol. 2022 Oct 26;13:948597. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.948597. eCollection 2022. Front Immunol. 2022. PMID: 36389713 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
HLF transactivates TFEB to promote gallbladder cancer stem cells' self-renewal and determines tumor response to distinct therapies.Sci Adv. 2025 Aug 8;11(32):eadv6723. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adv6723. Epub 2025 Aug 8. Sci Adv. 2025. PMID: 40779629 Free PMC article.
-
Cemiplimab monotherapy as first-line treatment of patients with brain metastases from advanced non-small cell lung cancer with programmed cell death-ligand 1 ≥50.Cancer. 2025 May 15;131(10):e35864. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35864. Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40323717 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous